首页> 外文OA文献 >The Use (or rather the non-Use) of Cost-Effectiveness Data in Priority Setting Decisions – Are We Underestimating the Barriers to Using Health Economics in Real World Priority Setting Decisions?; Comment on “Use of Cost-Effectiveness Data in Priority Setting Decisions: Experiences from the National Guidelines for Heart Diseases in Sweden”
【2h】

The Use (or rather the non-Use) of Cost-Effectiveness Data in Priority Setting Decisions – Are We Underestimating the Barriers to Using Health Economics in Real World Priority Setting Decisions?; Comment on “Use of Cost-Effectiveness Data in Priority Setting Decisions: Experiences from the National Guidelines for Heart Diseases in Sweden”

机译:在优先级设定决策中使用(或不使用)成本效益数据–我们是否低估了在现实世界中的优先级设定决策中使用卫生经济学的障碍?评论“在优先权设定决策中使用成本效果数据:瑞典国家心脏病指南的经验”

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

After having practicing and researching health economics for nearly 15 years now, it has become clear to me that the use of cost-effectiveness data in priority setting decisions is rather a rare than a common practice. The Eckard et al.article though, describes a wonderful exception to this rule and a very good example of how it can be used when the conditions are right. However, do we fully understand what these conditions are? In this commentary article I will address some of the institutional and cultural conditions that need to be fulfilled in order for cost-effectiveness data to actually be used in priority setting decisions.
机译:在对健康经济学进行了近15年的实践和研究之后,对我而言,很明显,在优先级确定决策中使用成本效益数据并不是一种罕见的做法,而是一种普遍的做法。然而,Eckard等人的文章描述了该规则的一个奇妙例外,并很好地说明了在条件合适时如何使用它。但是,我们是否完全了解这些条件是什么?在这篇评论性文章中,我将介绍一些需要满足的制度和文化条件,以便将成本效益数据实际用于优先级确定决策中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Erntoft Sandra;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 14:48:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号