首页> 外文OA文献 >Baffle and fixed media effects on coliform removal andudbacterial die-off rate coefficient in waste stabilization ponds (a case study in Ahvaz)
【2h】

Baffle and fixed media effects on coliform removal andudbacterial die-off rate coefficient in waste stabilization ponds (a case study in Ahvaz)

机译:挡板和固定介质对大肠菌群去除和 ud的影响废物稳定池中的细菌死亡率系数(以阿瓦士为例)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The use of waste stabilization ponds is one of the cheapest wastewater treatment processes.udThis study evaluated the effects of baffles and fixed media on coliform removal in facultative lagoons.udMethods: In this study, the settled wastewater from four pond systems of the city of Ahvaz was usedudas input. Each system was composed of two ponds that were connected to each other serially. Three ofudthem were equipped with two, three, and four baffles. Packages of fixed media were installed in the firstudbaffled pond equal to the number of baffles. During a 12-month sampling period from March 2016udto February 2017, the capability of each system to remove coliform with different detention times wasudstudied.udResults: The control system with no baffle and no media reduced the coliform index by an average ofud67% in a detention time of 6 to 12 days. Increasing the baffles and fixed media in the ponds improvedudthe coliform removal efficiency; systems with two, three, and four baffles achieved coliform removaludin the amounts of 77%, 81%, and 83%, respectively. The coliform die-off coefficients (Kb) were higherudin the attached growth systems than in the control system. The coefficients were determined to beud0.21, 0.26, 0.29, and 0.31 d-1 for the second ponds of the control, two-, three-, and four-baffle systems,udrespectively.udConclusion: This method can be used to upgrade the existing waste stabilization pond and to designudnew ponds with at least two baffles in the facultative lagoons.
机译:背景:使用废物稳定池是最便宜的废水处理工艺之一。 ud本研究评估了挡板和固定介质对兼性泻湖中大肠菌群去除的影响。 ud方法:本研究中,来自四个池塘系统的沉降废水使用了阿瓦兹市 udas输入。每个系统都由两个彼此串联的池塘组成。其中的三个装有两个,三个和四个挡板。固定介质包装安装在第一个 udbaffled的池塘中,数量等于挡板的数量。在2016年3月至2017年2月的12个月采样期内,研究了每种系统去除具有不同滞留时间的大肠菌的能力。 ud结果:没有挡板且没有培养基的对照系统平均降低了大肠菌指数在拘留6到12天之内的 ud67%。增加池塘中的挡板和固定培养基可以提高大肠菌群的去除效率。具有两个,三个和四个挡板的系统分别实现大肠菌去除率达77%,81%和83%。大肠菌死亡系数(Kb)在附着的生长系统中高于对照系统。对照的第二个池塘(两个,三个和四个挡板系统)的系数分别确定为 ud0.21、0.26、0.29和0.31 d-1。 ud结论:该方法可以是用来升级现有的废物稳定池,并在兼用泻湖中设计至少带有两个挡板的池塘。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号