首页> 外文OA文献 >Schering-Plough Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission: Eleventh Circuit Rejects the FTC’s Position on “Reverse Payments” in Patent Suit Settlements
【2h】

Schering-Plough Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission: Eleventh Circuit Rejects the FTC’s Position on “Reverse Payments” in Patent Suit Settlements

机译:先灵P雅公司(Schering-Plough Corp.)诉联邦贸易委员会(Federal Trade Commission):第十一巡回法院驳回了联邦贸易委员会(FTC)在专利诉讼和解中对“逆向付款”的立场

摘要

In recent years, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or the “Commission”) has investigated several settlement agreements between pioneer and generic drug manufacturers involving “reverse payments.” In the view of the FTC, reverse payments are cash that a pioneer drug manufacturer pays to a generic manufacturer who has challenged the patent(s) protecting the pioneer drug, in exchange for the generic manufacturer’s agreement to delay market entry. Such payments sometimes occur in the settlement of patent infringement actions. The Commission has been extremely skeptical of reverse payments, viewing them as objective indicia of intent to illegally share monopoly profits that the delayed generic entry perpetuates. It has successfully challenged settlement agreements that included reverse payments involving the market entry of generic Cardizem (hypertension treatment) and generic Hytrin (hypertension and angina treatment).
机译:近年来,联邦贸易委员会(“ FTC”或“委员会”)调查了先驱与仿制药制造商之间涉及“逆向付款”的几项和解协议。美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)认为,反向付款是先驱药品制造商支付给质疑挑战保护先驱药品的专利的仿制药生产商的现金,以换取仿制药生产商同意延迟进入市场的协议。这种付款有时会在解决专利侵权诉讼中发生。欧盟委员会一直对反向支付持怀疑态度,认为反向支付是意图非法分享被延迟仿制进入永久存在的垄断利润的客观标志。它已成功挑战了结算协议,其中包括涉及通用Cardizem(高血压治疗)和通用Hytrin(高血压和心绞痛治疗)市场准入的反向付款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号