首页> 外文OA文献 >Improvement to Air Management Practices Assessment Tool (AMPAT): Scientific Literature Database
【2h】

Improvement to Air Management Practices Assessment Tool (AMPAT): Scientific Literature Database

机译:空气管理实践评估工具(AMPAT)的改进:科学文献数据库

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The livestock and poultry production industry lacks a current, science-based guide for evaluation of air quality mitigation technologies. Therefore, we performed a science-based review of mitigation technologies using practical, stakeholders-oriented evaluation criteria to identify knowledge gaps/needs and focuses for future research efforts on technologies and areas with the greatest impact potential. Our objectives were to (1) present a recently completed Literature Database, and (2) identify and rank research needs and knowledge gaps based on the Literature Database. The Air Management Practices Tool (AMPAT) is web-based (available at www.agronext.iastate.edu/ampat) and provides an objective overview of mitigation practices best suited to address odor, gaseous, and particulate matter (PM) emissions at livestock operations. This tool helps livestock and poultry producers compare and explore different mitigation technologies. Simultaneously, a literature review of 267 papers was performed to evaluate mitigation technologies performance for emissions of odor, VOCs, NH3, H2S, PM, and GHGs and inform future research needs. Swine production systems were the most researched with 52% of the data entries. Housing and manure storage were the most researched sources of emissions with 41 and 43% of the data entries respectively. Biofilters were the most popular and farm tested technology for reducing emissions from animal housing. Aeration, anaerobic digestion, composting, diet manipulation and covers were the most researched technologies for reducing emission during manure storage and handling, with aeration being the most effective means of odor reduction farm scale tested. Injection or incorporation was the most farm tested and effective technology researched for land application.
机译:畜禽生产行业缺乏基于科学的最新指南来评估空气质量缓解技术。因此,我们使用面向利益相关者的实用评估标准对缓解技术进行了基于科学的审查,以识别知识差距/需求,并着眼于未来对具有最大影响潜力的技术和领域的研究工作。我们的目标是(1)介绍一个最近完成的文献数据库,以及(2)根据文献数据库确定研究需求和知识差距并对其进行排名。空气管理实践工具(AMPAT)是基于Web的(可从www.agronext.iastate.edu/ampat获得),提供了最适合解决牲畜气味,气态和颗粒物(PM)排放的缓解措施的客观概述。操作。该工具可帮助畜禽生产商比较和探索不同的缓解技术。同时,对267篇论文进行了文献综述,以评估缓解技术在气味,VOC,NH3,H2S,PM和GHG排放方面的性能,并满足未来的研究需求。猪生产系统的研究最多,有52%的数据输入。住房和粪便存储是研究最多的排放源,分别占数据输入的41%和43%。生物过滤器是减少动物住房排放的最受欢迎且经过农场测试的技术。曝气,厌氧消化,堆肥,饮食处理和覆盖物是减少粪肥存储和处理过程中排放量的最受研究的技术,曝气是经过测试的减少异味农场的最有效手段。注入或掺入是经过农场测试和研究的最有效的土地应用技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号