首页> 外文OA文献 >Role-Based Policing: Restraining Police Conduct “Outside the Legitimate Investigative Sphere”
【2h】

Role-Based Policing: Restraining Police Conduct “Outside the Legitimate Investigative Sphere”

机译:基于角色的警务:限制警察在“合法侦查范围之外”的行为

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The last quarter of a century has produced a growing legitimacy crisis in the criminal justice system arising from profound and familiar differences in race and class. The same tactics used to win the War on Crime also harassed and intimidated the very people policing was supposed to protect, sending disproportionate numbers of young minority men and women to prison as part of War On Drugs.In this article, I take up challenge of social norms theorists who advocate empowering police and local communities through a variety of traditional and newly minted public order offenses. My claim is that the sort of preventative policing they advocate, singling out quality of life issues, can and should be separated from reactive investigative policing directed at apprehending criminals. The police, as currently constituted, are simply the wrong people to engage in preventative policing. My proposal is to radically restructure the manner in which we think about the legitimacy of various policing practices and the type of authority wielded by the police. The rule-based attempt to limit police authority through prospective constitutional (and other) norms limiting their ability to search, seize, and interrogate suspects does not work to constrain their ability to police public order and engage in crime prevention. Instead, I propose a series of role-based constraints of the scope of police authority.Much like the separation-of-powers limitation upon the various branches of government, role-based constraints suggest that municipalities should match the authority conferred upon particular government officials to the specific problems to be addressed through public order policing. The appropriate local authorities include bus drivers and crossing guards: municipal officials with no power to engage in investigation but who have the authority to enforce norms of public order. Such officials possess limited institutional legitimacy outside of their various spheres of operation and no role-based authority to engage in the invasive, investigative policing practices currently utilized in predominantly urban areas
机译:由于种族和阶级的深刻和熟悉的差异,导致刑事司法系统中的合法性危机日益严重。用来赢得犯罪战争的相同策略也骚扰和恐吓本应维持治安的人民,将不成比例的年轻男女男女囚禁作为毒品战争的一部分。在本文中,我接受了挑战社会规范理论家主张通过各种传统的和新近制定的公共秩序犯罪来增强警察和地方社区的权能。我的主张是,他们所提倡的那种预防性警务,特别是生活质量问题,可以而且应该与针对逮捕罪犯的被动性调查性警务分开。目前组成的警察只是从事预防性警务的错误人员。我的建议是从根本上重组我们思考各种警务实践的合法性以及警察行使的权力类型的方式。基于规则的尝试通过可能的宪法(和其他)规范来限制警察的权威,这些规范限制了警察搜捕,扣押和讯问嫌疑犯的能力,但这并不能限制警察维护公共秩序和预防犯罪的能力。取而代之的是,我提出了一系列基于角色的警察权力范围约束条件,就像对政府各个部门的分权制限制一样,基于角色的约束条件表明市政当局应该匹配赋予特定政府官员的权力通过公共秩序警务解决的特定问题。适当的地方当局包括公共汽车司机和过路警卫:市政官员无权从事调查,但有权执行公共秩序准则。这些官员在其各个业务领域之外的机构合法性有限,并且没有以角色为基础的权限来从事目前主要在城市地区使用的侵入性,调查性警务实践

著录项

  • 作者

    Miller Eric J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号