首页> 外文OA文献 >“Pick”ering the Speech Rights of Public School Teachers: Arguing for a Movement by Courts toward the Hazelwood-Tinker Standard under the First Amendment
【2h】

“Pick”ering the Speech Rights of Public School Teachers: Arguing for a Movement by Courts toward the Hazelwood-Tinker Standard under the First Amendment

机译:“挑选”公立学校教师的话语权:主张法院根据第一修正案向Hazelwood-Tinker标准迈进

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This Note addresses freedom of speech issues facing the nationu27s public schools, concentrating on the recent decision by the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Lee v. York County School Division, for the final paper in my First Amendment course. Ultimately, this Note analyzes the court’s decision in this case and both standards set forth by the Supreme Court in dealing with free speech rights in the field of public education, which are currently creating a circuit split between the Courts of Appeals. The Note argues that the Hazelwood-Tinker standard applied to student speech should be the general standard used by all courts. The Note then argues against the alternate Pickering-Connick standard, used by the District Court in Lee, that analyzed free speech claims by public school teachers under an employer-employee relationship test for government occupations.
机译:本说明解决了美国公立学校面临的言论自由问题,重点是弗吉尼亚州东区地方法院在Lee诉York County School Division案中对我的《第一修正案》的最终论文的最新裁定。最终,本说明分析了法院在此案中的裁决以及最高法院在处理公共教育领域的言论自由权方面制定的两个标准,目前这两个标准在上诉法院之间造成了分歧。注释指出,适用于学生演讲的Hazelwood-Tinker标准应该是所有法院使用的通用标准。然后,本说明与Lee地区法院使用的Pickering-Connick替代标准相抵触,该标准在政府职业的雇主与雇员关系测试下分析了公立学校教师的言论自由主张。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bennett Heather P;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号