首页> 外文OA文献 >EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN KUADRAT DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN PONOROGO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016
【2h】

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN KUADRAT DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN PONOROGO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016

机译:X所国立学校X所国立中学高中生团队游戏(TGT)类型和数字头在一起(NHT)类型的合作学习模型的实验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Experimentation of Cooperative Learning of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) Type and Numbered Head Together (NHT) Type on The Subject of Quadratic Equations and Inequalities from Students’ Mathematics Anxiety of Tenth Grades of Senior High Schools in Ponorogo District in The Academic Year of 2015/2016. THESIS. Supervisor I: Prof. Dr. Budiyono, M. Sc., II: Dr. Budi Usodo, M. Pd. Mathematics Education of Graduate Program Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of Sebelas Maret University Surakarta. The objectives of this study were to find out: 1) which one get the better learning achievement between students who were treated the cooperative learning models of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) type, Numbered Head Together (NHT) type, or students who were treated direct learning, 2) which one get the better learning achievement, between students with high, average, or low mathematics anxiety, 3) in each mathematic anxiety category, which one get the better learning achievement between students who were treated the cooperative learning models of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) type, Numbered Head Together (NHT) type, or students who were treated direct learning, 4) in each from learning models, wich one get the better learning achievement, among students with , average, or low mathematics anxiety. This research was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The study population was all tenth grade students of Senior High Schools in Ponorogo district. The samples of the research were the students of SMA Negeri 1 Balong, SMA Negeri 1 Jetis, and SMA Negeri 1 Jenangan, which were taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics learning achievement test and multiple intelligences questionnaire. Before used for data collection, the instrument test and questionnaire was tried out. The content validity assessment of test and questionnaire was conducted by the related experts. Reliability of questionnaire instrument used cronbach alpha formula and internal consistency used the product moment correlation formula from Karl Pearson. Reliability of test instrument used KR-20 formula and discrimination power of item test used product moment correlation formula from Karl Pearson. Balance test used one way ANAVA test. Test of requirements include the normality tests by using Lilliefors test methods and homogeneity test used Bartlett method. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANAVA with unbalanced cell. The results could be concluded as follows: 1) students who were treated with the cooperative model of TGT and NHT have equal mathematics achievement, students who were treated with the cooperative model of TGT got better achievement than students treated by direct learning, in addition students who were treated with the cooperative model of NHT and direct learning have equal mathematics achievement, 2) students with low and average mathematics anxiety got matheamtics achievement better than students with high mathematics anxiety, then students with low mathematics anxiety got mathematics achievement better than students with average mathematics anxiety, 3) in each mathematics anxiety category, students who were treated with the cooperative model of TGT and NHT have equal mathematics achievement, students who were treated with the cooperative model of TGT got better achievement than students treated by direct learning, in addition students who were treated with the cooperative model of NHT and direct learning have equal mathematics achievement, 4) in each from learning models, Students with low and average mathematics anxiety got mathematics achievement better than students with high mathematics anxiety, then students with low mathematics anxiety got mathematics achievement better than students with average mathematics anxiety. Keywords: Team Games Tournament (TGT), Numbered Head Together (NHT), Direct Learning, Mathematics Anxiety
机译:2015年度Ponorogo地区高中10年级学生数学焦虑中的二次方程和不等式的团队游戏锦标赛(TGT)和数字联手(NHT)合作学习实验/ 2016。论文。主管I:Budiyono博士,理学硕士,II:Budi Usodo博士,理学博士。 Sebelas Maret University Surakarta研究生课程学院的数学教育。这项研究的目的是要发现:1)在接受团队游戏锦标赛(TGT)类型,齐头并进(NHT)类型的合作学习模式的学生或接受过治疗的学生之间,哪个人的学习成绩更好直接学习2)在数学焦虑程度高,平均或低的学​​生之间,哪个获得了较好的学习成绩; 3)在每个数学焦虑类别中的学生之间,获得了较好的学习成绩小组比赛锦标赛(TGT)类型,数字联手(NHT)类型或接受过直接学习的学生,在每种学习模式中,每种都有4),在数学焦虑,中等或低数学焦虑的学生中,有一个学习效果更好。这项研究是采用3x3因子设计的准实验研究。研究人群均为Ponorogo地区高中所有的十年级学生。该研究的样本是SMA Negeri 1 Balong,SMA Negeri 1 Jetis和SMA Negeri 1 Jenangan的学生,这些学生均采用分层整群随机抽样方法进行了研究。用于数据收集的工具是数学学习成绩测试和多元智能调查表。在用于数据收集之前,先进行了仪器测试和问卷调查。测试和问卷的内容效度评估由相关专家进行。问卷工具的可靠性使用cronbach alpha公式,内部一致性使用Karl Pearson的乘积矩相关公式。测试仪器的可靠性使用了KR-20公式,而项测试的辨别力则使用了Karl Pearson的产品矩相关公式。平衡测试使用一种方式ANAVA测试。需求测试包括使用Lilliefors测试方法的正态性测试和使用Bartlett方法的均质性测试。所使用的数据分析技术是带有不平衡单元的双向ANAVA。结果可归纳为:1)TGT和NHT合作模式下的学生数学成绩均等,TGT和NHT合作模式下的学生比直接学习的学生成绩更好。接受过NHT和直接学习的合作模式治疗的学生数学成绩相同; 2)数学焦虑程度较低和中等的学生比数学焦虑程度较高的学生的数学成绩更好,而数学焦虑程度较低的学生的数学成绩则高于数学焦虑程度的学生。平均数学焦虑,3)在每个数学焦虑类别中,使用TGT和NHT的合作模型治疗的学生具有相等的数学成绩,使用TGT的合作模型治疗的学生的成就要比直接学习的学生好。接受过合作模式治疗的加法学生NHT和直接学习具有相同的数学成绩,4)在每个学习模型中,数学焦虑程度较低和中等的学生比数学焦虑程度较高的学生的数学成绩更好,然后,数学焦虑程度较低的学生的数学成绩优于平均数学水平的学生焦虑。关键字:团队比赛(TGT),联手(NHT),直接学习,数学焦虑

著录项

  • 作者

    HANIAH WAHYU NUR;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号