首页> 外文OA文献 >EFEKTIVITAS PENERAPAN METODE DISKUSI DENGAN PENDEKATAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK (PMR) DAN PENDEKATAN QUANTUM LEARNING (QL) DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN SISWA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN LAMPUNG TIMUR
【2h】

EFEKTIVITAS PENERAPAN METODE DISKUSI DENGAN PENDEKATAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK (PMR) DAN PENDEKATAN QUANTUM LEARNING (QL) DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN SISWA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN LAMPUNG TIMUR

机译:讨论方法对现实数学(PMR)方法和量子学习(QL)方法的应用效果是从人格类型的人格类型研究的,以提高VIII类学习成绩的学生,NAB LEG​​ER在SMP NEGER,NEGER LAMP。

摘要

The aims of this research are to know: (1) Which one more effective, learning using discussion with realistic mathematics approach, Quantum Learning (QL) or a conventional learning. (2) Which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, student with personality types Sanguine, Melancholy, Choleric or Phlegmatis. (3) Which one more effective for each personality type of students, learning using discussion with PMR, QL or a conventional learning. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of state junior high school in East Lampung Regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the samples was 303 students. The data collection technique were the document that was the last of examination the seven grade for initial capability data before the experiment, achievement tests for mathematics student achievement data, and questioner of personality types. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows: (1) learning mathematics using discussion with PMR is as effective as learning mathematics using the method of discussion with QL. However, learning of mathematics using discussion with PMR approach is more effective than learning mathematics using discussion with conventional approach. Likewise, learning mathematics using discussion with QL approach is more effective than learning mathematics using discussion with conventional approach. (2) Students with personality types of Sanguine, Melancholy, Choleric, nor Phlegmatis have the same mathematics achievement. (3) For each personality type of students, learning using discussion with PMR approach is as effective as using discussion with QL. However, using discussion with PMR and QL approach is more effective than learning mathematics the method of discussion with conventional approach.
机译:这项研究的目的是要知道:(1)使用讨论与现实数学方法,量子学习(QL)或常规学习相结合的方法来学习哪种方法更有效。 (2)哪种人的数学学习成绩更好,性格类型为血红,忧郁,胆汁或痰湿的学生。 (3)对于每种性格类型的学生,使用PMR,QL讨论或常规学习进行学习哪个更有效。本研究采用准实验方法,其人口包括东楠榜摄政初中的所有学生。通过分层整群随机抽样进行抽样。样本大小为303名学生。数据收集技术是在实验之前对七年级的初始能力数据,数学学生的成就数据进行成就测试以及性格类型提问者的最后考试。使用方差分析对数据进行分析。研究的结论如下:(1)使用PMR讨论进行学习与使用QL讨论进行学习一样有效。但是,使用PMR方法讨论进行数学学习比使用常规方法讨论进行数学学习更为有效。同样,使用讨论和QL方法学习数学比使用讨论和常规方法学习数学更有效。 (2)具有Sanguine,Melancholy,Choleric和Phlegmatis人格类型的学生具有相同的数学成绩。 (3)对于每种性格类型的学生,使用PMR讨论进行学习与使用QL进行讨论一样有效。但是,使用PMR和QL方法进行讨论比使用传统方法进行讨论的方法学习数学更为有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号