首页> 外文OA文献 >EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF THINKING ALOUD PAIR PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) PADA MATERI SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINIER DUA VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016
【2h】

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF THINKING ALOUD PAIR PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) PADA MATERI SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINIER DUA VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016

机译:在KEMISAH KARISU KARISU的七年级中学阶段的较高的两种变量设备评审中,对大量的配对问题解决(TAPPS)和团队支持的个性化(TAI)进行了合作学习模型的实验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from critical thinking ability of the student. The learning models compared were Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (TAPPS) model, Teams Assisted Individualization (TAI) and direct model. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students of 8th grade Junior High School in Karanganyar. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 270 students; consisted of 90 students in the first experimental class, 90 students in the second experimental class, and 90 students in control class. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and test of critical thinking ability. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unequal cells. The results of research showed that: (1) TAPPS model had better learning achievement than TAI model and direct model, TAI model had better learning achievement than direct model. (2) the students having high critical thinking ability had better learning achievement than those having medium and low critical thinking ability, the students having medium critical thinking ability had better learning achievement than those having low critical thinking ability; (3) For each of the learning model the students having high critical thinking ability had better learning achievement than those having medium and low critical thinking ability, the students having medium critical thinking ability had better learning achievement than those having low critical thinking ability; (4) For each level of critical thinking ability, TAPPS model gave better learning achievement than TAI model and direct model. TAI model gave mathematics learning achievement is better than direct learning model.
机译:这项研究的目的是从学生的批判性思维能力出发,研究学习模型对数学学习成绩的影响。比较的学习模型是大声对问题解决(TAPPS)模型,团队辅助个性化(TAI)模型和直接模型。本研究为3×3析因设计的准实验研究。研究的人群为Karanganyar八年级初中的所有学生。通过分层聚类随机抽样选择样本。样本为270名学生。由第一实验班的90名学生,第二实验班的90名学生和对照组的90名学生组成。用来收集数据的工具是数学成绩的测试和批判性思维能力的测试。分析数据的技术是不等细胞的双向方差分析。研究结果表明:(1)TAPPS模型的学习成绩优于TAI模型和直接模型,TAI模型的学习成绩优于直接模型。 (2)批判性思维能力高的学生的学习成绩要比中,批判性思维能力低的学生的学习成绩好;批判性思维能力中等的学生比批判性思维能力低的学生的学习成绩要好; (3)对于每种学习模式,批判性思维能力高的学生的学习成绩要比中度和低批判性思维能力的学生要好;中等批判性思维能力的学生要比那些批判性思维能力低的学生要好。 (4)对于批判性思维能力的每个水平,TAPPS模型的学习成绩均优于TAI模型和直接模型。 TAI模型给出的数学学习成绩优于直接学习模型。

著录项

  • 作者

    WULANDARY ARY ASTUTY;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号