首页> 外文OA文献 >PENGABAIAN FAKTA-FAKTA PERSIDANGAN OLEH JUDEX FACTIE SEBAGAI DASAR PENGAJUAN KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS PERKARA PENGGELAPAN DALAM JABATAN (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1455 K / Pid / 2013)ud
【2h】

PENGABAIAN FAKTA-FAKTA PERSIDANGAN OLEH JUDEX FACTIE SEBAGAI DASAR PENGAJUAN KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS PERKARA PENGGELAPAN DALAM JABATAN (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1455 K / Pid / 2013)ud

机译:声明JUDEX FACTIE FACTIE FACTS事实作为免费决定部门的课程决策的政策(最高法院第1455 K号决定/诉讼/ 2013) ud

摘要

BSTRACT Triastianto Nugroho. E0011318. 2015. NULLIFYING TRIAL BY FACTS JUDEX FACTIE AS THE BASIS APPEALS PROSECUTOR GENERAL OF DECISIONS INDEPENDENT POSITION IN THE CASE EVASION (Study of the Supreme Court Decision No. 1455 K / Pid / 2013). Thesis. Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. The writing of this law aims to determine whether neglect the facts of the trial by Judex factie as the reason for the appeal of the public prosecutor against the acquittal in a case of embezzlement in the positions meet kaedah appeals and legal reasons the Supreme Court to examine and decide the appeal the prosecutor in a case of embezzlement in the post , The prescriptive normative research and applied. Source material is the law of primary legal materials and secondary law which uses literature study for data collection techniques. Meanwhile, legal materials analysis technique used is the method of deductive syllogism with patterns of thinking. Based on the results of the study concluded that the reason for the filing of an appeal by the Public Prosecutor on the basis of Judex factie not apply the rules of evidence by ignoring the facts of the trial in the form of witness testimony in a case of embezzlement in the position in accordance with the provisions of Article 253 paragraph (1) letter a Criminal Procedure Code, it is because in the first instance verdict Surabaya District Court ignored the fact that the trial evidence in the form of witness testimony in a case of embezzlement in office. The consideration judge in examining and deciding the appeal the prosecutor against the decision of Surabaya District Court in a case of embezzlement in the position is in conformity with what the duties and authority of the Supreme Court to create a unified application of the law by way of canceling the decision of the Court requested an appeal for the rule of law is not applied or not applied properly, then the Supreme Court to hear the case itself in accordance with Article 246 Jo Article 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Consideration judge in examining and deciding the appeal has met the elements of judgment juridical, philosophical and sociological. Keywords: Reason Filing Cassation, Law of Evidence, the Judge Considerations
机译:摘要Triastianto Nugroho。 E0011318。 2015年。事实无效,JUDEX FACTIE作为案件上诉中决策独立地位的基础上诉程序总检察长(最高法院第1455 K号决定/诉讼/ 2013年)。论文。 Sebelas Maret Surakarta大学法学院。制定该法律的目的是确定是否忽略Judex事实的审判事实,将其作为检察官对贪污案件的无罪释放提出上诉的理由是否符合kaedah上诉和最高法院审查的法律理由并在职务侵占案件中决定检察官的上诉,规范性的规范研究与适用。原始资料是将文献研究用于数据收集技术的主要法律资料和次要法律。同时,使用的法律材料分析技术是具有思维模式的演绎三段论方法。根据研究结果得出的结论是,检察官基于Judex事实提出上诉的理由并不适用证据规则,因为在以下情况下,证人以证词形式忽略了审判事实根据《刑法》第253条第(1)款的规定挪用公款,是因为泗水区法院一审判决不考虑以下事实:在办公室挪用公款。在考虑和决定检察官针对泗水地方法院在贪污案件中的决定提出的上诉时,审议法官与最高法院通过以下方式制定统一法律的职责和权限相一致:取消法院的决定要求对法治不适用或不适当地适用的上诉作出决定,然后最高法院根据《刑事诉讼法》第246条和第256条对案件本身进行审理。审理法官在审查和裁决上诉时,已符合司法,哲学和社会学上的判决要素。关键字:理由提起上诉,证据定律,法官注意事项

著录项

  • 作者

    NUGROHO TRIASTIANTO;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号