首页> 外文OA文献 >EFEKTIVITAS METODE PEMBELAJARAN ud KOOPERATIF GROUP INVESTIGATION ud DALAM MATA PELAJARAN GEOGRAFI PADA udKOMPETENSI DASAR KEMAMPUAN MENERAPKAN SIG DALAM udKAJIAN GEOGRAFI DI SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 2 GEMOLONG udTAHUN AJARAN 2008/ 2009 ud
【2h】

EFEKTIVITAS METODE PEMBELAJARAN ud KOOPERATIF GROUP INVESTIGATION ud DALAM MATA PELAJARAN GEOGRAFI PADA udKOMPETENSI DASAR KEMAMPUAN MENERAPKAN SIG DALAM udKAJIAN GEOGRAFI DI SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 2 GEMOLONG udTAHUN AJARAN 2008/ 2009 ud

机译:学习方法的有效性 合作小组调查 在地理课上在GIS中应用GIS的基本能力MUHAMMADIYAH 2 GEMOLONG高中的地理研究2008/2009学年

摘要

udAri Irnawati Hidayah. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUP INVESTIGATION udCOOPERATIVE LEARNING METHOD IN GEOGRAPHY SUBJECT IN udBASIC COMPETENCE OF CAPABILITY OF IMPLEMENTING THE udGEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM (SIG) IN GEOGRAPHICAL udSTUDY (An Experimental Study on Grade XII Students of SMA Muhammadiyah ud2 Gemolong in School Year of 2008/2009). Thesis, Surakarta: Teacher Training udand Education Faculty. Surakarta Sebelas Maret University, 2008. ud udThe objective of research is to find out the effectiveness of Group udInvestigation cooperative learning method (GI) in geography subject in the basic udcompetence of Capability of Implementing the Geographical Information System udin Geographical Study in the grade XII students of SMA Muhammadiyah 2 udGemolong in School Year of 2008/2009. udThis research employed an experimental method with Control Group udPretest-Posttest Design. The population of research was all grade XII IPS students udof SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Gemolong in School Year of 2008/2009 consisting of udfive classes. The sample was taken using cluster random sampling technique udinvolving 68 students divided into two classes: XII IPS 1 and XII IPS 2. udClassroom is considered as a group unit, so that with five classes of population, udthere are also five groups, each of which has an equal opportunity to be chosen as udthe sample. The technique of collecting data used for group investigation udcooperative learning method variable was literary study and the students‟ learning udresult was obtained through the multiple-choice test. Technique of collecting data udused was covariance analysis. udThe result shows that the values Fobs = 16.74, and F table (n = 34) at udsignificance level of 5% with Ftable = 3.99, meaning Fobs > Ftable (16.74 > 3.99), so udthat the H0 is not supported and Ha is supported; thus it can be concluded that udthere a significant difference of students‟ learning result score between expository udand group investigation (GI) methods. It can be seen from the means difference of udexpository and group investigation (GI) methods (62.07% and 74.05%). Thus, the udgroup investigation (GI) method is more effective than the expository one. ud
机译:udAri Irnawati Hidayah。小组调查 udcooperative学习方法在地理科目中的能力 ud地理地理信息系统(SIG)实施能力的基本能力(对SMA Muhammadlongiyah中学二年级学生进行的实验研究 ud2 Gemo 2008/2009)。论文,泗水:教师培训 udand教育学院。 Surakarta Sebelas Maret University,2008年。 ud ud研究的目的是在实现地理信息系统的基本能力 udin地理研究的基础上,找出小组 ud调查合作学习方法(GI)在地理学科中的有效性。在2008/2009学年SMA Muhammadiyah 2 udGemolong十二年级的学生中。 ud这项研究采用了控制组 udPretest-Posttest设计的实验方法。研究的人群均为2008/2009学年SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Gemolong的所有XII IPS等级的学生,其中包括 udf五个班级。样本是采用整群随机抽样技术 udin涉及的68名学生分为两个类别:XII IPS 1和XII IPS2。 udClassroom被视为一个小组单位,因此在五类人口中, udclassroom也有五个小组,每个人都有平等的机会被选为样本。群体调查合作学习方法变量的数据收集技术是文学研究,通过多项选择测验获得学生的学习结果。收集有用数据的技术是协方差分析。 ud结果表明,Fobs = 16.74,F table(n = 34)在5%的显着性水平下,Ftable = 3.99,这意味着Fobs> Ftable(16.74> 3.99),因此 ud不支持H0和哈支持;因此,可以得出结论,说明型 udand小组调查(GI)方法之间的学生学习成绩得分之间存在显着差异。从“异位存放”和“小组调查”(GI)方法的均值差异可以看出(62.07%和74.05%)。因此, udgroup调查(GI)方法比说明性方法更有效。 ud

著录项

  • 作者

    Hidayah Ari Irnawati;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"id","name":"Indonesian","id":20}
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 14:47:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号