首页> 外文OA文献 >EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPESTUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) PADA MATERI POKOK DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJARudSISWA SMA KELAS X DI KABUPATEN MAGETANudTAHUN PELAJARAN 2011/2012
【2h】

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPESTUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) PADA MATERI POKOK DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJARudSISWA SMA KELAS X DI KABUPATEN MAGETANudTAHUN PELAJARAN 2011/2012

机译:学习活动回顾的材料三维协作学习模型团队成就部(STAD)和团队游戏锦标赛(TGT)的实验玛格丹地区的X类高中生2011/2012学年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one has a better learning achievement between cooperative learning STAD, TGT, and conventional learning, (2) which one has a better learning achievement; the students having high, medium, or low learning activity, (3) which one gives a better learning achievement based on their high, medium, and low learning activity between cooperative learning STAD, TGT and conventional learning. The population of the research was the whole students of tenth grade of senior high school in Magetan. The sampling technique was done withstratified cluster random sampling. Based on the result of data analysis, it can be concluded: (1) The cooperative learning STAD gave a better learning achievement than TGT, TGT gave a better achievement than conventional learning, and STAD gave a better learning than conventional learning. (2) The students with higher learning activity had a better learning achievement than the students with lower learning activity. (3) For studentshaving high learning activity, cooperative learning STAD had a better learning achievement than TGT and conventional learning, and cooperative learning TGT and conventional learning had the same learning achievement.For students having medium learning activity, cooperative learning STAD and TGT had the samelearning achievement and so didTGTand conventional learning, however, cooperative learning STAD had a better learning achievement than conventional learning. For students havinglow learning activity, cooperative learning STAD, TGT, and conventional learning had the same learning achievement.
机译:本研究的目的是要知道:(1)在合作学习STAD,TGT和常规学习之间哪个学习成绩更好;(2)哪个学习成绩更好?具有高,中或低学习活动的学生,(​​3)根据合作学习STAD,TGT和常规学习之间的高,中和低学习活动,他们可以获得更好的学习成绩。研究的人口是玛格丹高中十年级的全体学生。采用分层聚类随机抽样进行抽样。根据数据分析的结果,可以得出以下结论:(1)合作学习型STAD的学习成绩比TGT好,TGT的成绩比传统学习好,STAD的学习效果比传统学习好。 (2)学习活动程度较高的学生的学习成绩要好于学习活动程度较低的学生。 (3)对于学习活动活跃的学生来说,合作学习STAD的学习成绩要高于TGT和传统学习,而合作学习TGT和传统学习的学习成绩则相同;对于中等学习活动的学生来说,合作学习STAD和TGT的学习成绩要高一些。同样的学习成绩,TGT和常规学习也是如此,但是,合作学习STAD的学习成绩要好于常规学习。对于学习活动较低的学生,合作学习STAD,TGT和常规学习具有相同的学习成绩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号