EKSISTENSI SENTRA PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERPADU DALAM udPENANGANAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU LEGISLATIF udTAHUN 2009 (Studi Kasus di Daerah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri udSukoharjo)

摘要

This research has aim to find out the matter related with handling udpattern of Legislative General Election criminal act case at the year of ud2009, to find out the existence of Gakkumdu Centre in the handling of udlegislative election criminal act case at the year of 2009 in law area of udSukoharjo District Court and to find out the constraintobstruction faced udby Gakkumdu Centre in the handling of Legislative General Election udcriminal act case at the year of 2009 in law area of Sukoharjo District udCourt.udThis research is done in law area of Sukoharjo District Court with udempirical or sociological research. Data collection method used is field udstudy and library study for deriving primary and secondary data. Data udanalysis in this research is qualitative data analysis with interactive udanalysis model.udAfter doing analysis, it is derived conclusion that the handling udpattern of Legislative Election criminal act case at the year of 2009 udaccording to Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2008 has determined udprocedure of law established specifically in the settlement of legislative udgeneral election criminal act case by providing investigation time limit of udinvestigation, pre-pursuit, pursuit that is shorter than KUHAP. The udexistence of Gakumdu Centre (Integrated Law Enforcement) in Sukoharjo udRegency whose members consist of Panswaslu element, Indonesia Police udof Sukoharjo Resort, and element from Sukoharjo District Attorney in udhandling of Legislative General Election criminal act case at the year of ud2009 is not optimal yet, of eight criminal report submitted to Panwaslu, udonly two of them that can be processed but only one that is stated udcomplete (P-21) that is behalf of defendant Syarif Hidayatullah and is udhanded over to the pursuit stage, even it is decided by Sukoharjo District udCourt for six month in jail and fine of Rp. 6.000.000,-(six million rupiah) udbut in the higher level court (banding) the defendant is sentenced to be udfree. While the other archive is behalf of Drs. Suwandi is stated uduncompleted by Attorney with the reason that it is expired. Meanwhile, udthe obstructions faced by Gakkumdu Centre is : (1) there is udinterpretation difference toward the prevailing Law rule determination, ud(2) there is no clarity about the reporting time period (3) time tolerance of udthe handling of legislative general election criminal act is to limited so udthat the handling is done in a hurry.