首页> 外文OA文献 >Art history at the art school: revisiting the institutional origins of the discipline based on the case of nineteenth-century Greece
【2h】

Art history at the art school: revisiting the institutional origins of the discipline based on the case of nineteenth-century Greece

机译:美术学校的美术史:基于19世纪希腊的案例重新审视该学科的制度渊源

摘要

As part of a broader research on the teaching of art history in nineteenth-century art academies, this paper focuses on the courses offered at the Athenian School of Arts from 1844 to 1863 by the historian and philologist Grigorios Pappadopoulos. In his teaching, Papadopoulos turned away from the tradition of a universal history for artists established in Italian and French art schools, and proposed instead an in-depth study of ancient Greek art, drawing on the German university model, and more particularly on Karl Otfried Müller’s Handbuch der Arhchaölogie der Kunst (1830). The paper examines the various operations that permitted the re-invention of an archaeological manual for the purposes of art education, and analyses the different approaches to the study of ancient art developed within the School of Arts and the Athenian University during the period. I argue that adapting the scholarly study of art to the needs of artistic training gave way to approaches primarily centred on objects, techniques and forms, rather than on the construction of historical narratives. The Greek case is used in order to reflect more broadly on the scholarly courses of art academies, which remain largely overlooked both within the history of art education and the history of art history. Lying at the intersection of these two fields, scholarly training at the art school, and art history courses in particular, may permit both a re-evaluation of art education in the nineteenth century and a better understanding of the varied institutional frameworks that shaped art history as a discipline.
机译:作为对19世纪艺术学院艺术史教学的更广泛研究的一部分,本文着重探讨了历史学家和语言学家Grigorios Pappadopoulos在1844年至1863年在雅典艺术学院开设的课程。在他的教学中,帕帕多普洛斯放弃了意大利和法国艺术学校中建立的艺术家的普遍历史传统,而是提议以德国大学的模式,尤其是卡尔·奥特弗里德(Karl Otfried)为基础,对古希腊艺术进行深入研究。穆勒的《艺术史上的手工艺品》(Handbuch derArhchaölogieder Kunst)(1830年)。本文考察了允许为艺术教育目的而重新发明考古手册的各种操作,并分析了在此期间艺术学院和雅典大学开发的古代艺术研究的不同方法。我认为,使艺术的学术研究适应艺术训练的需要,而让位于主要以对象,技术和形式为中心的方法,而不是历史叙事的构建。使用希腊语的情况是为了更广泛地反映艺术学院的学术课程,在艺术教育历史和艺术史中,这些学科仍然被很大程度上忽略。躺在这两个领域的交汇处,艺术学校的学术训练,尤其是艺术史课程,可以重新评估19世纪的艺术教育,并且可以更好地理解塑造艺术历史的各种制度框架作为一门学科。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vratskidou Eleonora;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:23:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号