首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of estimated drug costs of potentially inappropriate medications between older patients receiving nurse home visit services and patients receiving pharmacist home visit services: a cross-sectional and propensity score analysis
【2h】

A comparison of estimated drug costs of potentially inappropriate medications between older patients receiving nurse home visit services and patients receiving pharmacist home visit services: a cross-sectional and propensity score analysis

机译:接受护士上门拜访服务的老年患者与接受药剂师上门拜访服务的患者之间可能不适当用药的估计药物成本比较:横断面和倾向得分分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThere have been no multicenter studies that estimated the relations of either nurse or pharmacist home visit program to drug costs of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). This study aimed to establish whether patients who used nurse or pharmacist home visit programs (nurse or pharmacist program) had lower drug costs of PIMs than those who did not use nurse or pharmacist programs for older patients living at home.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in home care settings in Japan, involving 430 patients aged 65 or older, of whom 276 were female. All received regular home visits from five clinics between May and December 2013. After the PIMs were identified with the Screening Tool of Older Personsu27 potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria, we estimated the drug costs based on actual pharmaceutical prices and measured against who using nurse or pharmacist programs after a propensity score weighted adjustment.ResultsPatients who used nurse programs had lower drug cost of PIMs than those who did not use, but it was not significantly different (5.9 ± 13.1 vs 7.1 ± 13.9 USD per month, P = 0.199). The cost of PIMs for patients who used pharmacist programs also had no difference. (7.2 ± 14.5 vs 5.5 ± 11.5 USD per month, P = 0.06). In the patient groups who used nurse programs, patients who also used pharmacist programs had significantly higher costs of PIMs than those who used only nurse programs (5.5 ± 13.9 vs 2.5 ± 6.0 USD per month, P = 0.006). In patients group who did not use pharmacist programs, patients who only used nurse programs had significantly lower costs of PIMs than those who did not use nurse programs (3.6 ± 7.7 vs 5.8 ± 12.7 USD per month, P = 0.022).ConclusionsPatients who used nurse program have a trend towards lower drug costs of PIMs than those who used nurse and pharmacist program or pharmacist program alone. Although this study tried to adjust the potential confounders as possible as we could by using propensity score analysis, further studies are needed to confirm our results.
机译:背景技术目前尚无多中心研究估算护士或药剂师的家访计划与潜在不适当药物(PIM)的药物成本之间的关系。这项研究旨在确定使用护士或药剂师家庭访问计划(护士或药剂师计划)的患者,其PIM的药物成本是否低于那些不在家中居住的老年患者不使用护士或药剂师计划的患者。在日本的家庭护理机构中进行,涉及430位65岁以上的患者,其中276位是女性。在2013年5月至12月之间,所有患者均接受了来自五家诊所的定期家访。在使用“老年人筛查工具”确定可能存在不当处方(STOPP)标准的PIM后,我们根据实际药品价格估算了药品费用,并根据结果表明,使用护士计划的患者的PIM药物成本比未使用药物的患者低,但差异无统计学意义(每月5.9±13.1 vs 7.1±13.9 USD,P = 0.199)。使用药剂师计划的患者的PIM费用也没有差异。 (7.2±14.5与每月5.5±11.5美元,P = 0.06)。在使用护士计划的患者组中,也使用药剂师计划的患者的PIM成本明显高于仅使用护士计划的患者(每月5.5±13.9 vs 2.5±6.0 USD,P = 0.006)。在不使用药剂师程序的患者组中,仅使用护士程序的患者的PIM成本显着低于不使用护士程序的患者(3.6±7.7 vs 5.8±12.7 USD /月,P = 0.022)。与仅使用护士和药剂师计划或仅使用药剂师计划的人相比,护士计划的PIM药物成本有降低的趋势。尽管这项研究试图通过使用倾向得分分析来尽可能地调整潜在的混杂因素,但仍需要进一步的研究来确认我们的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号