首页> 外文OA文献 >Does the process map influence the outcome of quality improvement work? A comparison of a sequential flow diagram and a hierarchical task analysis diagram
【2h】

Does the process map influence the outcome of quality improvement work? A comparison of a sequential flow diagram and a hierarchical task analysis diagram

机译:流程图是否会影响质量改进工作的结果?顺序流程图和分层任务分析图的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Many quality and safety improvement methods in healthcare rely on a complete and accurate map of the process. Process mapping in healthcare is often achieved using a sequential flow diagram, but there is little guidance available in the literature about the most effective type of process map to use. Moreover there is evidence that the organisation of information in an external representation affects reasoning and decision making. This exploratory study examined whether the type of process map - sequential or hierarchical - affects healthcare practitioners' judgments.Methods: A sequential and a hierarchical process map of a community-based anti coagulation clinic were produced based on data obtained from interviews, talk-throughs, attendance at a training session and examination of protocols and policies. Clinic practitioners were asked to specify the parts of the process that they judged to contain quality and safety concerns. The process maps were then shown to them in counter-balanced order and they were asked to circle on the diagrams the parts of the process where they had the greatest quality and safety concerns. A structured interview was then conducted, in which they were asked about various aspects of the diagrams.Results: Quality and safety concerns cited by practitioners differed depending on whether they were or were not looking at a process map, and whether they were looking at a sequential diagram or a hierarchical diagram. More concerns were identified using the hierarchical diagram compared with the sequential diagram and more concerns were identified in relation to clinical work than administrative work. Participants' preference for the sequential or hierarchical diagram depended on the context in which they would be using it. The difficulties of determining the boundaries for the analysis and the granularity required were highlighted.Conclusions: The results indicated that the layout of a process map does influence perceptions of quality and safety problems in a process. In quality improvement work it is important to carefully consider the type of process map to be used and to consider using more than one map to ensure that different aspects of the process are captured.
机译:背景:医疗保健中的许多质量和安全性改进方法都依赖于完整,准确的过程图。医疗保健中的过程映射通常是使用顺序流程图来实现的,但是在文献中几乎没有关于使用哪种最有效的过程图的指南。此外,有证据表明,外部表示形式的信息组织会影响推理和决策。这项探索性研究研究了过程图的类型(顺序的还是分层的)是否会影响医疗从业者的判断。方法:基于从访谈,交谈获得的数据,生成基于社区的抗凝诊所的顺序图和分层图。 ,参加培训课程并检查协议和政策。要求临床医生指定他们认为包含质量和安全问题的过程部分。然后以平衡的顺序向他们显示过程图,并要求他们在图上圈出它们最关注质量和安全性的过程部分。然后进行了结构化访谈,询问他们有关图表的各个方面。结果:从业人员引用的质量和安全问题因他们是否查看流程图以及是否查看流程图而有所不同。顺序图或层次图。与顺序图相比,使用分层图识别出更多的关注点,并且与行政工作相比,与临床工作相关的关注点也更多。参与者对顺序图或层次图的偏好取决于他们使用该图的环境。结论强调了确定分析边界和所需粒度的困难。结论:结果表明,流程图的布局确实会影响对流程中质量和安全问题的认识。在质量改进工作中,重要的是要仔细考虑要使用的过程图的类型,并考虑使用多个图,以确保捕获过程的不同方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号