首页> 外文OA文献 >Verbal autopsy for stillbirth and neonatal deaths – comparing population cause specific mortality fraction using two methods
【2h】

Verbal autopsy for stillbirth and neonatal deaths – comparing population cause specific mortality fraction using two methods

机译:对死产和新生儿死亡进行口头尸检–使用两种方法比较人群引起的特定死亡率

摘要

Background: Every year 3.2 million infants are stillborn and 3.6 million die within the first month. Up to 98% of these deaths occur in countries with inadequate or non-existent vital registration systems, where cause of death data are sparse and mostly derived from verbal autopsies (VA). It has been advocated that VA are included in routine national statistics. This thesis proposes and compares the strengths and limitations of methodologies to collect and interpret VA data for stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Methods: Data were derived from three research areas in Malawi, Nepal and Mumbai. The development of classifications, diagnostic algorithms and questionnaires for VA, suitable for physician review interpretation is described. A probabilistic method to analyse all age deaths (InterVA) was adapted for stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Cause specific mortality fractions were compared using physicians’ review and InterVA. Results: Neonatal mortality rate in Malawi was 25/1000 livebirths (LB), in Nepal 31/1000 LB and in Mumbai 16/1000 LB. A total of 922 VA including both live and stillbirths were analysed to establish causes of death. Stillbirths accounted for 44-54% of deaths. Of neonatal deaths, in Malawi the majority were attributed to severe infections according to physician review (55%) and InterVA (46%); in Nepal (43%) and Mumbai (61%) perinatal asphyxia was most common according to InterVA. In Nepal however, physician review ascribed the majority of neonatal deaths to severe infections (50%). Kappa statistics for individual agreement comparing both methods was 0.60 (CI 0.567-0.702) in Malawi, 0.62(CI 0.59- 0.65) in Nepal and 0.48(0.40 - 0.50) in Mumbai.udDiscussion: Different VA interpretation methods exist, however standardised procedures are necessary for international comparison. The role of physicianudreview in interpreting VA is changing while computerised methods are becoming more widespread. The modified InterVA model provides a rapid and consistent method to establish causes of stillbirths and neonatal deaths, however it requires further refinements and ultimately a validation study using a comparison other than physician review.
机译:背景:每年第一个月内有320万婴儿死产,360万婴儿死亡。这些死亡中,多达98%的死亡发生在生命登记系统不完善或不存在的国家,这些国家的死因数据稀少,且大多来自口头尸检(VA)。提倡将VA纳入常规国家统计数据。本文提出并比较了用于死产和新生儿死亡的VA数据收集和解释方法学的优势和局限性。方法:数据来自马拉维,尼泊尔和孟买的三个研究领域。描述了适用于医师评论解释的VA分类,诊断算法和问卷的开发。一种用于分析所有年龄死亡的概率方法(InterVA)适用于死产和新生儿死亡。使用医生的评论和InterVA比较了特定原因的死亡率。结果:马拉维的新生儿死亡率为25/1000活产儿(LB),尼泊尔为31/1000 LB,孟买为16/1000LB。分析了包括活产和死产在内的总共922 VA,以确定死亡原因。死产占死亡的44-54%。根据医生的评论(55%)和InterVA(46%),在马拉维新生儿死亡中,大多数归因于严重感染。根据InterVA,尼泊尔(43%)和孟买(61%)围产期窒息最常见。然而,在尼泊尔,医生复查将新生儿死亡的大部分归因于严重感染(50%)。比较这两种方法的个人协议的Kappa统计数据在马拉维为0.60(CI 0.567-0.702),在尼泊尔为0.62(CI 0.59-0.65),在孟买为0.48(0.40-0.50)。 ud讨论:存在不同的VA解释方法,但是采用标准化程序是国际比较所必需的。当计算机化方法变得越来越普及时,医师 udreview在解释VA中的作用正在发生变化。修改后的InterVA模型提供了一种快速,一致的方法来确定死产和新生儿死亡的原因,但是,它需要进一步完善,最终需要通过比较而不是医师评审来进行验证研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vergnano S;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号