首页> 外文OA文献 >Giemsa versus acridine orange staining in the fish micronucleus assay and validation for use in water quality monitoring
【2h】

Giemsa versus acridine orange staining in the fish micronucleus assay and validation for use in water quality monitoring

机译:鱼微核分析中吉姆萨与versus啶橙的染色以及用于水质监测的验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study concerns a comparative analysis of the acridineorange and Giemsastaining procedures for the fish erythrocyte micronucleusassay. The goal was to optimize the assay in the context of field watermonitoring. Fish (Carassius carassius) were exposed to a reference genotoxic agent, cyclophosphamide monohydrate 5 mg l−1 for 2, 4, and 6 days before testing. Slides from each individual were scored using the two procedures. The results show that the assay was more sensitive when acridineorange was used. When slides were Giemsa stained, the presence of ambiguous artefacts, leading to false positives and increasing random variance, reduced the contrast between exposed and control samples. AcridineOrangestaining was then applied in the context of waterqualitymonitoring. Fish were exposed for 4 days to water sampled in two hydrological contexts: basal flow and spring flood. The results show that exposure to spring flood water in an agricultural stream can induce mutagenicity.
机译:这项研究涉及鱼红细胞微核素分析的cr啶橙和吉姆染色法的比较分析。目的是在现场水监测的情况下优化测定。在测试之前,将鱼(Car鱼)暴露于参比的遗传毒性剂一水合环磷酰胺5 mg -1,持续2、4和6天。使用这两个过程对每个人的幻灯片进行评分。结果表明,当使用a啶橙时,该测定更为灵敏。当载玻片被吉姆萨染色时,模棱两可的伪影的存在会导致假阳性并增加随机方差,从而降低了暴露样本与对照样本之间的对比度。然后在水质监测中应用啶橙染色。将鱼暴露于在两种水文环境中采样的水中4天:基础流量和春季洪水。结果表明,暴露在农业流中的春季洪水中会引起诱变性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号