首页> 外文OA文献 >The Secret Is Out: Patent Law Preempts Mass Market License Terms Barring Reverse Engineering for Interoperability Purposes
【2h】

The Secret Is Out: Patent Law Preempts Mass Market License Terms Barring Reverse Engineering for Interoperability Purposes

机译:秘密已经揭晓:专利法优先于大众市场许可条款,除非出于互操作性目的进行逆向工程

摘要

As patent protection has emerged to protect software, courts and commentators have mistakenly focused on copyright law and overlooked the centrality of patent preemption to limit contract law where a mass market license which prohibits reverse engineering (RE) for purposes of developing interoperable products leads to patent-like protection. Review of copyright fair use cases on RE and Congress’s policy favoring RE for interoperability purposes in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act reinforce the case for patent preemption. Also, the fundamental freedom to RE embodied in state trade secret law, coupled with federal patent and copyright law and policies, cumulatively should override a contract barrier on RE based upon the public policy exception to contract enforcement. If courts fail to consider patent and public policy limits on contract, the anomalous result is potential outsourcing of interoperability development to one of the increasing number of foreign jurisdictions where interoperability policy overrides contract law. Ironically, that would harm the U.S. economy and thereby frustrate the purpose of the Intellectual Property Clause of the Constitution. Finally, the patent preemption/public policy invalidation approach to mass market contracts outlined in this article may also provide a new lens whenever a mass market contract results in a de-facto monopoly on useful data.
机译:随着专利保护的出现来保护软件,法院和评论员错误地将注意力集中在版权法上,而忽视了抢占专利权以限制合同法的中心地位,因为为了开发可互操作的产品而禁止进行逆向工程(RE)的大众市场许可导致了专利的产生。样的保护。审查有关RE的版权合理使用案例以及国会在《数字千年版权法案》中出于互操作性的目的而支持RE的政策进一步强化了专利优先权。同样,基于商业秘密实施的公共政策例外,州商业秘密法中体现的基本权利的基本自由,再加上联邦专利和版权法和政策,应累计克服可再生能源的合同壁垒。如果法院不考虑合同的专利和公共政策限制,则异常结果可能是将互操作性开发外包给越来越多的互操作性政策超越合同法的外国管辖区之一。具有讽刺意味的是,这将损害美国经济,从而挫败《宪法》知识产权条款的目的。最后,每当大众市场合同导致对有用数据的事实上垄断时,本文概述的针对大众市场合同的专利抢占/公共政策无效方法也可能提供一个新的视角。

著录项

  • 作者

    Laster Daniel;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号