首页> 外文OA文献 >Feasibility of flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician
【2h】

Feasibility of flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician

机译:急诊医师在院外进行心肺复苏时,用轻柔引导的气管插管配合插管喉罩的可行性

摘要

Background and objective: We tested the feasibility of using the intubating laryngeal mask airway Fastrach(TM) (ILMA) as a ventilatory device and for flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician.ududMethods: After completion of a training programme, a single experienced emergency physician used the technique for all patients requiring out-of-hospital tracheal intubation over a 10-month period. If access to the head and neck was limited, the intubating laryngeal mask airway was inserted from below and to the side, otherwise it was inserted from above the head. Data about the time for the ambulance to reach the patient, whether or not access to the head and neck was limited, whether or not circulation was successfully restored, and the insertion and intubation success rates were noted.ududResults: The mean (range) time for the ambulance to reach the patient was 12 (10-20) min. Access to the head and neck was limited in 8/37 (22%). Circulation was successfully restored in 10/37 (27%). The intubating laryngeal mask airway was successfully inserted at the first attempt in 35/37 (95%) and at the second attempt in 2/37 (5%). The tracheal tube was successfully inserted in 25/37 (67.5%) at the first attempt, 7/37 (19%) at the second attempt and 5/37 (13.5%) at the third attempt. There were no overall failures for intubating laryngeal mask airway insertion or tracheal intubation. There were no differences in success rate between positions. Oesophageal intubation was detected and corrected in 2/37 (5%).ududConclusion: The intubating laryngeal mask airway has a high success rate as a ventilatory device and as a flexible lightwand-guided airway intubator during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by a well-trained emergency physician. This technique may be particularly useful when there is limited access to the head and neck.
机译:背景与目的:我们测试了由急诊医师使用插管式喉罩气道Fastrach(TM)(ILMA)作为通气设备以及用于轻型引导的气管插管进行院外心肺复苏的可行性。 udMethods:完成培训计划后,一位经验丰富的急诊医师在10个月的时间内对所有需要院外气管插管的患者使用了该技术。如果限制进入头部和颈部,则从下方和侧面插入插管式喉罩气道,否则从头部上方插入。记录了有关救护车到达患者的时间,是否可以接近头部和颈部,是否成功恢复血液循环以及插入和插管成功率的数据。范围)救护车到达病人的时间为12(10-20)分钟。进入头部和颈部的机会受限于8/37(22%)。循环成功恢复了10/37(27%)。第一次尝试以35/37(95%)成功插入插管喉罩气道,第二次尝试以2/37(5%)成功插入插管喉罩气道。第一次尝试成功将气管插管插入25/37(67.5%),第二次尝试成功插入7/37(19%),第三次尝试成功插入5/37(13.5%)。没有插入喉罩气道插管或气管插管的整体失败。职位之间的成功率没有差异。结论:在医院外心肺手术中,气管插管作为呼吸机和柔性光导气管插管成功率很高,在2/37(5%)的情况下进行了食管插管检测和纠正。由训练有素的急诊医师进行复苏。当对头部和颈部的访问受限时,此技术可能特别有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号