首页> 外文OA文献 >Exercise training comprising of single 20-s cycle sprints does not provide a sufficient stimulus for improving maximal aerobic capacity in sedentary individuals
【2h】

Exercise training comprising of single 20-s cycle sprints does not provide a sufficient stimulus for improving maximal aerobic capacity in sedentary individuals

机译:由单个20秒周期冲刺组成的运动训练不能提供足够的刺激来改善久坐人士的最大有氧运动能力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: Sprint interval training (SIT) provides a potent stimulus for improving maximal aerobic capacity ([Formula: see text]), which is among the strongest markers for future cardiovascular health and premature mortality. Cycling-based SIT protocols involving six or more 'all-out' 30-s Wingate sprints per training session improve [Formula: see text], but we have recently demonstrated that similar improvements in [Formula: see text] can be achieved with as few as two 20-s sprints. This suggests that the volume of sprint exercise has limited influence on subsequent training adaptations. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine whether a single 20-s cycle sprint per training session can provide a sufficient stimulus for improving [Formula: see text]. Methods: Thirty sedentary or recreationally active participants (10 men/20 women; mean ± SD age: 24 ± 6 years, BMI: 22.6 ± 4.0 kg m(-2), [Formula: see text]: 33 ± 7 mL kg(-1) min(-1)) were randomised to a training group or a no-intervention control group. Training involved three exercise sessions per week for 4 weeks, consisting of a single 20-s Wingate sprint (no warm-up or cool-down). [Formula: see text] was determined prior to training and 3 days following the final training session. Results: Mean [Formula: see text] did not significantly change in the training group (2.15 ± 0.62 vs. 2.22 ± 0.64 L min(-1)) or the control group (2.07 ± 0.69 vs. 2.08 ± 0.68 L min(-1); effect of time: P = 0.17; group × time interaction effect: P = 0.26). Conclusion: Although we have previously demonstrated that regularly performing two repeated 20-s 'all-out' cycle sprints provides a sufficient training stimulus for a robust increase in [Formula: see text], our present study suggests that this is not the case when training sessions are limited to a single sprint.
机译:目的:短跑间歇训练(SIT)为改善最大有氧运动能力提供了有效的刺激([公式:参见文本]),这是未来心血管健康和过早死亡的最强标志。每个训练课程涉及六个或更多“全力” 30秒Wingate冲刺的基于自行车的SIT协议得到了改进[公式:参见文本],但是我们最近证明,通过以下方式可以在[公式:参见文本]中实现类似的改进少到两个20秒的冲刺。这表明冲刺运动的数量对随后的训练适应性影响有限。因此,本研究的目的是检验每个训练课中一个20s的周期冲刺是否可以提供足够的刺激来改善[公式:见正文]。方法:30名久坐或消遣的参与者(10名男性/ 20名女性;平均±SD年龄:24±6岁,BMI:22.6±4.0 kg m(-2),[公式:参见文本]:33±7 mL kg( -1)min(-1))被随机分为训练组或无干预对照组。培训每周进行3次运动,共4周,包括一次20秒钟的Wingate冲刺(没有热身或冷静)。 [公式:见正文]是在训练之前和最后训练之后的3天确定的。结果:在训练组(2.15±0.62 vs. 2.22±0.64 L min(-1))或对照组(2.07±0.69 vs. 2.08±0.68 L min(-)中,均值[公式:参见文本]没有明显变化。 1);时间效应:P = 0.17;组×时间相互作用效应:P = 0.26)。结论:尽管我们先前已经证明定期进行两次重复的20秒“全力以赴”冲刺可以提供足够的训练刺激力,以使[公式:参见文字]显着增加,但我们目前的研究表明,当培训课程仅限于一次冲刺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号