首页> 外文OA文献 >Does Law School Curriculum Affect Bar Examination Passage? An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Which Were Related to Bar Examination Passage between 2001 and 2006 at a Midwestern Law School
【2h】

Does Law School Curriculum Affect Bar Examination Passage? An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Which Were Related to Bar Examination Passage between 2001 and 2006 at a Midwestern Law School

机译:法学院的课程会影响律师考试的通道吗? 2001年至2006年中西部法学院律师考试通道相关因素的实证分析

摘要

Does Law School Curriculum Affect Bar Examination Passage? Abstract A quantitative, empirical study was undertaken to determine whether there was a relationship between the number of bar examination subject matter courses taken in law school and bar examination passage. Previous studies reported relationships between LSAT scores, undergraduate grade point averages (UGPA), law school class rank and bar examination passage. Many law schools are advocating or mandating that students with low class rank take upper division, bar examination subject matter courses in an effort to improve the bar examination passage rate for those students. This study examined all 2001-2005 graduates of Saint Louis University School of Law (n = 827) who took the Missouri bar examination as their first bar examination between 2001 and 2006. The study included 429 male and 398 females. Independent sample t-tests and binary logistic regression analysis were conducted using LSAT scores, UGPA and the mean number of upper division, bar examination subject matter courses as the independent variables and bar examination passage as the dependent variable. A statistically significant relationship using binary logistic regression was found between LSAT scores, UGPA, mean number of bar examination subject matter courses and bar examination passage in the study. However, the relationship between bar examination subject matter courses taken and bar examination passage was isolated to subjects who ranked in the third quartile of their graduating class. [passed (mean = 9.0301, SD 1.51927), failed (mean = 8.17060, SD 1.87060); t (197) = 2.913, p = .002] Binary logistic regression [z = 4.755, p = .029]. No statistically significant relationships were found between bar examination subject matter courses taken and bar examination passage for graduates ranked in the first, second or fourth quartiles of their graduating class. The authors conclude that mandating that students take more bar examination subject matter courses will not improve bar examination passage rates for at risk law school students who rank in the lowest quartile of their graduating class.
机译:法学院的课程会影响律师考试的通道吗?摘要进行了一项定量的经验研究,以确定法学院的律师考试科目课程数量与律师考试通过率之间是否存在关系。先前的研究报告了LSAT分数,本科平均分(UGPA),法学院课程等级和律师考试成绩之间的关系。许多法学院主张或强制要求低班级学生参加高年级的律师考试科目课程,以提高这些学生的律师考试通过率。这项研究调查了2001年至2005年圣路易斯大学法学院(n = 827)的所有毕业生,他们在2001年至2006年间将密苏里州律师考试作为其第一次律师考试。该研究包括429名男性和398名女性。使用LSAT评分,UGPA和上半部平均数,酒吧考试主题课程作为自变量和酒吧考试通过率作为独立变量进行独立样本t检验和二元logistic回归分析。在研究中,LSAT分数,UGPA,律师考试主题课程的平均数和律师考试通过之间发现了使用二项逻辑回归的统计学显着性关系。但是,律师考试科目课程与律师考试通过率之间的关系仅与排名在其毕业班级的四分之三的科目隔离。 [通过(平均值= 9.0301,SD 1.51927),失败(平均值= 8.17060,SD 1.87060); t(197)= 2.913,p = .002]二元对数回归[z = 4.755,p = .029]。在所考研究生的第一,第二或第四四分位数中,所考律师考试科目课程与律师考试通过之间没有统计学上的显着关系。作者得出的结论是,强制要求学生修读更多的律师考试科目课程,将不会提高排名最低的四分之一的法学院学生的律师考试合格率。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rush Douglas; Matsuo Hisako;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号