首页> 外文OA文献 >In vitro Detection of Occlusal Caries on Permanent Teeth by a Visual, Light-Induced Fluorescence and Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence Methods
【2h】

In vitro Detection of Occlusal Caries on Permanent Teeth by a Visual, Light-Induced Fluorescence and Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence Methods

机译:视觉,光诱导的荧光和光热辐射法和调制的发光方法体外检测永久性牙齿上的龋齿。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The paradigm shift towards the nonsurgical management of dental caries relies on the early detection of the disease. Detection of caries at an early stage is of unequivocal importance for early preventive intervention. Objective: The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the performance of a visual examination using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria, two quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) systems - Inspektor™ Pro and QLF-D Biluminator™ 2 (Inspektor Research Systems B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) - and a photothermal radiometry and modulated luminescence, The Canary System® (Quantum Dental Technologies, Toronto, Ont., Canada) on the detection of primary occlusal caries on permanent teeth. Methods: A total of 60 teeth with occlusal surface sites ranging from sound to noncavitated lesions (ICDAS 0-4) were assessed with each detection method twice in a random order. Histological validation was used to compare methods for sensitivity, specificity, percent correct, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), at standard and optimum sound thresholds. Interexaminer agreement and intraexaminer repeatability were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: Interexaminer agreement ranged between 0.48 (The Canary System®) and 0.96 (QLF-D Biluminator™ 2). Intraexaminer repeatability ranges were 0.33-0.63 (The Canary System®) and 0.96-0.99 (QLF-D Biluminator™ 2). The sensitivity range was 0.75-0.96 while that of specificity was 0.43-0.89. The AUC were 0.79 (The Canary System®), 0.87 (ICDAS), 0.90 (Inspektor™ Pro), and 0.94 (QLF-D Biluminator™ 2). Conclusion: ICDAS had the best combination of sensitivity and specificity followed by QLF-D Biluminator™ 2 at optimum threshold.
机译:背景:向龋齿非手术治疗的转变依赖于疾病的早期发现。早期发现龋齿对于早期预防干预至关重要。目的:这项体外研究的目的是使用国际龋齿检测和评估系统(ICDAS)标准,两个定量光诱导荧光(QLF)系统-Inspektor™Pro和QLF-D Biluminator评估视觉检查的性能™2(Inspektor Research Systems BV,荷兰阿姆斯特丹)–以及光热辐射法和调制发光技术,CanarySystem®(Quantum Dental Technologies,加拿大安大略省多伦多),用于检测恒牙上的原发性咬合龋。方法:采用每种检测方法,以随机顺序对总共60颗牙齿的咬合表面部位(从声音到无空洞病变(ICDAS 0-4))进行了两次评估。使用组织学验证比较灵敏度,特异性,正确百分率以及在标准和最佳声音阈值下接收器工作特性曲线(AUC)下的面积的方法。使用类内相关系数来测量检查者之间的一致性和检查者内部的可重复性。结果:检测者之间的一致性介于0.48(CanarySystem®)和0.96(QLF-D Biluminator™2)之间。体内检查剂的重复性范围是0.33-0.63(CanarySystem®)和0.96-0.99(QLF-D Biluminator™2)。灵敏度范围为0.75-0.96,而特异性范围为0.43-0.89。 AUC为0.79(CanarySystem®),0.87(ICDAS),0.90(Inspektor™Pro)和0.94(QLF-D Biluminator™2)。结论:在最佳阈值下,ICDAS具有最佳的敏感性和特异性组合,其次是QLF-D Biluminator™2。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号