首页> 外文OA文献 >Performance of the Mortality in emergency department Sepsis score for predicting hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis and septic shock
【2h】

Performance of the Mortality in emergency department Sepsis score for predicting hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis and septic shock

机译:急诊败血症病死率评分在严重败血症和败血性休克患者中预测医院死亡率的表现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to test if the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score accurately predicts death among emergency department (ED) patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.MethodsThis study was a preplanned secondary analysis of a before-and-after interventional study conducted at a large urban ED. Inclusion criteria were suspected infection, 2 or more criteria for systemic inflammation, and either systolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg after a fluid bolus or lactate 4 mmol/L or higher. Exclusion criteria were: age of less than 18 years, no aggressive care desired, or need for immediate surgery. Clinical and outcomes data were prospectively collected on consecutive eligible patients for 1 year before and 1 year after implementing early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). The MEDS scores and probabilities of in-hospital death were calculated. The main outcome was in-hospital mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate score performance.ResultsOne hundred forty-three patients, 79 pre-EGDT and 64 post-EGDT, were included. The mean age was 58 ± 17 years, and pneumonia was the source of infection in 37%. The in-hospital mortality rate was 23%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for MEDS to predict mortality was 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.72) overall, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.56-0.82) in pre-EGDT patients, and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.33-0.74) in post-EGDT patients.ConclusionsThe MEDS score performed with poor accuracy for predicting mortality in ED patients with sepsis. These results suggest the need for further validation of the MEDS score before widespread clinical use.
机译:目的本研究旨在检验急诊败血症死亡率(MEDS)评分是否能准确预测重症败血症和败血性休克急诊(ED)患者的死亡。方法该研究是一项预先计划的前后前后二级分析在大型城市教育署进行的干预研究。入选标准为可疑感染,2项或以上全身性炎症标准,以及液体推注后收缩压低于90 mm Hg或乳酸4 mmol / L或更高。排除标准为:年龄小于18岁,不需要积极治疗或需要立即手术。前瞻性收集实施早期目标导向疗法(EGDT)之前1年和1年后的连续合格患者的临床和结局数据。计算了MEDS评分和院内死亡概率。主要结果是院内死亡率。结果用接收器操作特征曲线下的面积来评估评分表现。结果143例患者,其中EGDT前为79例,EGDT后为64例。平均年龄为58±17岁,肺炎是37%的感染源。住院死亡率为23%。接受者操作特征曲线下用于MEDS预测死亡率的区域总体为0.61(95%置信区间[CI],0.50-0.72),EGDT前患者为0.69(95%CI,0.56-0.82),而0.53(95) EGDT后患者的%CI,0.33-0.74)。结论MEDS评分在预测败血症ED患者死亡率方面的准确性较差。这些结果表明,在广泛的临床应用之前需要进一步验证MEDS评分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号