首页> 外文OA文献 >How the distinctive cultures of osteopathic and allopathic medical schools affect the careers, perceptions, and institutional efforts of their anatomy faculties: A qualitative case study of two schools
【2h】

How the distinctive cultures of osteopathic and allopathic medical schools affect the careers, perceptions, and institutional efforts of their anatomy faculties: A qualitative case study of two schools

机译:整骨疗法和同种疗法医学院的独特文化如何影响其解剖学系的职业,观念和机构工作:两个学校的定性案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Anatomy faculties are integral to basic science instruction in medical schools, particularly given the preponderance of anatomic instruction in the preclinical curriculum. Recent years have witnessed major curricular restructuring and other emerging national trends that pose significant challenges to anatomists. An examination of anatomy faculty perceptions at two philosophically distinct medical schools within this shifting climate provides an indicator of how different institutional characteristics may impact anatomy instruction and other faculty responsibilities. Semistructured interviews of anatomy faculty from a large, well-established allopathic medical school (Indiana University School of Medicine) and a small, new osteopathic medical school (Marian University College of Osteopathic Medicine) were explored using qualitative thematic analysis. Four overarching themes were identified: (1) Institutional philosophies, such as affiliation with osteopathic versus allopathic medicine, have minimal impact on how the anatomical sciences are taught. (2) Differences in anatomy faculty experiences at these two institutions are largely driven by the institution's size and history. There is a disparity between institutions in the relative importance of teaching and research, but an ability to do research is important for both faculties. (3) Anatomy instruction and research agendas are driven by personal philosophies and interests rather than institutional philosophy. (4) Autonomy is highly valued by anatomists at both institutions. All the participants share a devotion to educating future physicians. In fact, this study identified more similarities than differences in these two faculties. Finally, we argue that shared educational resources and research collaborations can improve anatomy education and faculty development at both institutions. Anat Sci Educ. © 2015 American Association of Anatomists.
机译:解剖系是医学院校基础科学教学不可或缺的组成部分,尤其是在临床前课程中,解剖学教学占主导地位。近年来,目睹了重大的课程结构调整和其他新兴的国家趋势,这对解剖学家构成了重大挑战。在这种不断变化的气候中,在两个哲学上截然不同的医学院对解剖学教师的看法进行的考察提供了一个指示,说明了不同的机构特征如何影响解剖学教学和其他教师职责。使用定性的主题分析方法,探索了来自大型,历史悠久的同种疗法医学院(印第安纳大学医学院)和小型的新型骨病医学院(玛丽亚大学整骨医学学院)的解剖学教师的半结构式访谈。确定了四个总体主题:(1)机构哲学,例如与骨病疗法和同种疗法药物的联属关系,对如何教授解剖学科学影响很小。 (2)这两个机构在解剖学教师经验上的差异在很大程度上取决于机构的规模和历史。机构之间在教学和研究的相对重要性方面存在差异,但是进行研究的能力对这两个学院都很重要。 (3)解剖学的指导和研究议程是由个人哲学和兴趣而不是制度哲学驱动的。 (4)两个机构的解剖学家都高度重视自治。所有参与者都致力于教育未来的医生。实际上,这项研究发现这两个系的相似之处多于差异。最后,我们认为共享的教育资源和研究合作可以改善两家机构的解剖学教育和教师发展。阿纳特科学教育。 ©2015美国解剖学家协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号