首页> 外文OA文献 >Effect of two additional interventions, test and reflection, added to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on seventh grade students practical skills and willingness to act : a cluster randomised trial
【2h】

Effect of two additional interventions, test and reflection, added to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on seventh grade students practical skills and willingness to act : a cluster randomised trial

机译:标准心肺复苏培训中增加了两种其他干预措施(测试和反思)对七年级学生的实践技能和行动意愿的影响:一项整群随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives The aim of this research is to investigate if two additional interventions, test and reflection, after standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training facilitate learning by comparing 13-year-old students practical skills and willingness to act. Settings Seventh grade students in council schools of two municipalities in south-east Sweden. Design School classes were randomised to CPR training only (O), CPR training with a practical test including feedback (T) or CPR training with reflection and a practical test including feedback (RT). Measures of practical skills and willingness to act in a potential life-threatening situation were studied directly after training and at 6 months using a digital reporting system and a survey. A modified Cardiff test was used to register the practical skills, where scores in each of 12 items resulted in a total score of 12-48 points. The study was conducted in accordance with current European Resuscitation Council guidelines during December 2013 to October 2014. Participants 29 classes for a total of 587 seventh grade students were included in the study. Primary and secondary outcome measures The total score of the modified Cardiff test at 6 months was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the total score directly after training, the 12 individual items of the modified Cardiff test and willingness to act. Results At 6 months, the T and O groups scored 32 (3.9) and 30 (4.0) points, respectively (pamp;lt;0.001), while the RT group scored 32 (4.2) points (not significant when compared with T). There were no significant differences in willingness to act between the groups after 6 months. Conclusions A practical test including feedback directly after training improved the students acquisition of practical CPR skills. Reflection did not increase further CPR skills. At 6-month follow-up, no intervention effect was found regarding willingness to make a life-saving effort.
机译:目的本研究的目的是通过比较13岁的学生的实际技能和行动意愿,来研究标准心肺复苏(CPR)训练后的另外两种干预措施(测试和反思)是否有助于学习。设置瑞典东南部两个城市的市政学校的七年级学生。设计学校的课程被随机分为仅CPR训练(O),具有包括反馈的实用测试(T)的CPR训练或具有反思性的CPR训练以及包括反馈的实用测试(RT)。在培训后和使用数字报告系统和调查的六个月后,直接研究了实际技能和在可能威胁生命的情况下采取行动的意愿的措施。经过改进的卡迪夫测验用于注册实践技能,其中12个项目中的每一项得分均得出12-48分的总分。这项研究是根据2013年12月至2014年10月之间的欧洲复苏委员会现行指南进行的。研究对象包括29个班级,共587名7年级学生。主要和次要结果衡量标准改良卡迪夫测试在6个月时的总分是主要结果。次要结果是培训后的总分,经过改进的卡迪夫测验的12个单独项目以及行动的意愿。结果在6个月时,T和O组分别获得32(3.9)和30(4.0)分(p <0.001),而RT组得到32(4.2)分(与T相比不显着)。 6个月后,两组之间的行动意愿没有显着差异。结论包括在培训后直接提供反馈的实践测试可以提高学生的实践心肺复苏术技能。反思并没有提高心肺复苏术的技能。在6个月的随访中,未发现愿意做出挽救生命的努力的干预效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号