首页> 外文OA文献 >Digital publishing, indexing and ethics: Implications in civil and hydraulic engineering and research
【2h】

Digital publishing, indexing and ethics: Implications in civil and hydraulic engineering and research

机译:数字出版,索引编制和道德规范:对土木和水利工程与研究的意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Digital publishing and electronics resources have changed our working environment for ever. In the course of civil engineering projects, the bibliographic search is conducted using Internet search engines, electronic repositories including commercial databases and open access repositories. These new techniques yield too many information that become useless unless they are critically evaluated by experts. The electronic aids have induced a widening gap between universities and small engineering companies, and between developed and developing countries, because many commercial services including databases and digital publishing are outrageously expansive. The technological revolution has some impact beyond, in particular in terms of research quality and impact. The research quality must be assessed through peer-reviewed publications, although the role of expert-reviewers is rarely acknowledged at its true value. While many research funding institutions and government agencies are driving the implementation of research quality assessment and framework, there is no single measure of research quality and impact. Simplistic metrics (impact factor, h-index) are naive, artificial and biased, and fairer indicators including the number of co-authors could be considered. Any assessment of research quality should focus on the reputation and impact of the researcher based upon his/her individual contributions in peer-reviewed publications, and his/her own impact on the research and professional communities. Civil engineering researchers are under pressure to publish more and more papers ("publish or perish"). With the increasing numbers of journals and conferences, an increasing number of unethical and dishonest behaviours have emerged. Although the problem is still small in absolute numbers, it is a critical issue discrediting the entire profession and the recent trend is alarming. The electronic aids, digital resources and Internet "surfing" do not replace basic scholarship, personal experience and professional expertise. Civil engineering is not a "virtual" science. Engineers and researchers must gain first hand experience in real professional situations, and comprehend the complex interactions between engineering and non-engineering constraints. All the e-resources and digital "band-aids" shall never replace critical thinking.
机译:数字出版和电子资源永远改变了我们的工作环境。在土木工程项目过程中,书目搜索是使用Internet搜索引擎,包括商业数据库的电子存储库和开放访问存储库进行的。这些新技术产生的信息太多,除非专家对其进行严格评估,否则它们将变得无用。电子辅助设备已经引起了大学与小型工程公司之间以及发达国家与发展中国家之间不断扩大的鸿沟,因为包括数据库和数字出版在内的许多商业服务都异常庞大。技术革命的影响超出范围,特别是在研究质量和影响方面。研究质量必须通过同行评审的出版物来评估,尽管很少有人认为专家评审的作用是真实的。尽管许多研究资助机构和政府机构都在推动研究质量评估和框架的实施,但没有单一的衡量研究质量和影响的方法。简单化的指标(影响因子,h指数)过于幼稚,人为和偏颇,可以考虑更公平的指标,包括合著者的数量。对研究质量的任何评估都应基于研究者在同行评审出版物中的个人贡献以及他/她对研究和专业社区的影响,着眼于研究者的声誉和影响。土木工程研究人员承受着发表越来越多论文的压力(“出版或灭亡”)。随着期刊和会议数量的增加,出现了越来越多的不道德和不诚实的行为。尽管这个问题的绝对数量仍然很少,但这是一个使整个行业声名狼藉的关键问题,最近的趋势令人震惊。电子教具,数字资源和互联网“冲浪”并不能取代基本的奖学金,个人经验和专业知识。土木工程不是一门“虚拟”科学。工程师和研究人员必须在实际的专业环境中获得第一手经验,并理解工程和非工程约束之间的复杂相互作用。所有电子资源和数字“创可贴”都绝不能取代批判性思维。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chanson Hubert;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号