首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative Distribution of System Losses to Market Participants Using Different Loss Allocation Methods
【2h】

Comparative Distribution of System Losses to Market Participants Using Different Loss Allocation Methods

机译:使用不同损失分配方法将系统损失分配给市场参与者的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A key part of electricity pricing is the fair and equitable allocation of system losses. This paper critically compares several existing loss allocation methods. The methods addressed include existing approaches such as pro rata method, proportional sharing method [1], loss formula [2], and incremental method [3], in addition to a new method proposed by the authors, which allocates losses from a loop-based representation of system behaviour. The distinct numerical allocation of losses in both the IEEE 14-bus network and a modified Nordic 41 bus system is listed for comparison. The similarity between the different loss allocations methods varies considerably, depending upon the system to which the methods are applied. This is primarily a result of the manner in which the different allocation methods address the impact of network structure. Further work is still required to determine which method encourages better system operation.
机译:电价的关键部分是公平合理分配系统损耗。本文严格地比较了几种现有的损失分配方法。除了作者提出的新方法外,解决的方法还包括现有方法,例如按比例方法,比例分配方法[1],损失公式[2]和增量方法[3],该新方法从环路分配损失。基于系统行为的表示。为了比较,列出了IEEE 14总线网络和改进的Nordic 41总线系统中的损耗的数值分配。不同损失分配方法之间的相似性差异很大,具体取决于应用该方法的系统。这主要是不同分配方法解决网络结构影响的方式的结果。仍然需要进一步的工作来确定哪种方法可以促进更好的系统操作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号