首页> 外文OA文献 >Conserving forest wildlife and other ecosystem services: Opportunity costs and the valuation of alternative logging regimes
【2h】

Conserving forest wildlife and other ecosystem services: Opportunity costs and the valuation of alternative logging regimes

机译:保护森林野生动植物和其他生态系统服务:机会成本和替代伐木制度的估值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ecosystems supply a wide variety of valued commodities, including ecological services. Valuing these commodities and determining the implications of their valuation for the optimal management of ecosystems is challenging. This paper considers the optimal spatial use of forest ecosystems given that they can be utilised for conserving wildlife species and for producing logs. It takes into account the alternatives of selective logging and heavy (less selective) logging. It considers whether it is optimal to partition the use of a forest so that a portion of it is used exclusively for wildlife conservation with the remainder being utilised for heavy logging (a dominant use strategy) or to combine wildlife conservation and selective logging in at least part of the forest (a multiple use strategy) with any remainder of the forest being available for heavy logging. The assumed objective is to maximise the profit from logging subject to the population of a focal forest wildlife species being sustained at a particular level, that is at a level at least equal to its minimum viable population. The optimal use strategy cannot be determined a priori but requires alternatives forgone to be assessed. While orangutans are used as an example, the model can be applied to other species. It can also be applied (as is shown) to other ecological services such as the quality of water flowing from forested areas. Although the model may appear at first sight to be quite particular, its application can be extended in several ways mentioned. It demonstrates that the optimal spatial patterns of ecosystem use require individual assessment.
机译:生态系统提供各种有价值的商品,包括生态服务。对这些商品进行估值并确定其估值对生态系统的最佳管理具有挑战性。本文考虑了森林生态系统的最佳空间利用,因为可以将其用于保护野生动植物物种和生产原木。它考虑了选择性日志记录和繁重(较少选择性)日志记录的替代方法。它考虑了对森林的使用进行分区是最优的,以便将森林的一部分专门用于野生动植物保护,而将其余部分用于重度伐木(占主导地位的使用策略),或者至少将野生动植物保护和选择性伐木结合起来森林的一部分(一种多用途策略),森林的其余部分都可用于大量伐木。假定的目标是使特定森林野生动植物物种的种群维持在特定水平,即至少等于其最小生存种群的水平,从而使伐木的利润最大化。最佳使用策略无法事先确定,但需要评估替代方案。以猩猩为例,该模型可以应用于其他物种。它也可以应用于(如图所示)其他生态服务,例如从林区流出的水的质量。尽管该模型乍一看可能看起来非常特殊,但是可以通过多种方式扩展其应用。它表明,生态系统利用的最佳空间格局需要单独评估。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tisdell Clem;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号