首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative effectiveness of loss allocation methods for providing signals to affect market operation
【2h】

Comparative effectiveness of loss allocation methods for providing signals to affect market operation

机译:损失分配方法提供影响市场运作的信号的比较有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The distribution of system losses, an integral part of electricity pricing, can play an important role in the operation of electricity markets. To date, despite the existence of many loss allocation methods, no one method is commonly used in established electricity markets. Furthermore, some markets are still considering using different methods that will provide more efficient treatment of losses and aid in improving market operations and structures. This paper compares the loss allocation methods used in existing markets in Eastern Australia and Great Britain, as well as with the pro rata and proportional sharing approaches. Through implementation of the loss allocation methods on the CIGRE Nordic 32 bus system we examine what behaviour each method encourages. Results suggest that the method used in the Australian market provides the most sophisticated signal to market participants. Similar results, however, can be obtained using the simpler approach taken in Great Britain. This reinforces that the selection of loss allocation will be a market dependent problem.
机译:系统损耗的分配是电价不可或缺的一部分,可以在电力市场的运作中发挥重要作用。迄今为止,尽管存在许多损失分配方法,但是在已建立的电力市场中,通常没有一种方法可以使用。此外,一些市场仍在考虑使用不同的方法来提供更有效的损失处理方法,并有助于改善市场运作和结构。本文比较了东澳大利亚和英国现有市场中使用的损失分配方法,以及按比例和比例分配方法。通过在CIGRE Nordic 32总线系统上实施损耗分配方法,我们研究了每种方法所鼓励的行为。结果表明,在澳大利亚市场上使用的方法向市场参与者提供了最复杂的信号。但是,使用在英国采用的简单方法可以获得类似的结果。这加强了损失分配的选择将是一个与市场有关的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号