首页> 外文OA文献 >Intimacy as freedom : friendship, gender and everyday life
【2h】

Intimacy as freedom : friendship, gender and everyday life

机译:亲密无间:自由,友谊,性别和日常生活

摘要

Friendship arguably offers itself as the freest of all human associations. A weakness of cultural prescription opens a terrain in which intimacy can be lived in a trust relationship that personifies equality, justice and respect. Friendship's 'relational freedom' enables the mutual development of selves; it is generative. Therein lies 'the beauty of friendship', as Agnes Heller has reminded us. But the freedom of intimacy is limited. Embedded in a society that attributes different repertoires of intimacy to women and men and privileges male homosociality, friendship's freedom is curtailed. Especially cross-sex friendships continue to show evidence of persisting tensions. 'Erotic friendships' that seek to realize sexual intimacy but eschew the commitments of coupledom continue to face normative-practical challenges. In this paper, I view central aspects of heterosexual intimacy through the small world of intimate friendship, a prism that refracts gendered tensions in the world at large.
机译:可以说,友谊是所有人类协会中最自由的。文化处方的弱点开辟了一个可以使亲密关系生活在信任关系中的境界,这种信任关系体现了平等,正义和尊重。友谊的“关系自由”促进了自我的共同发展。它是生成的。正如艾格尼丝·海勒(Agnes Heller)提醒我们的那样,这里蕴含着“友善之美”。但是亲密的自由是有限的。根植于一个社会,该社会将不同的亲密关系归于男女,并赋予男性同性恋特权,友谊的自由受到限制。尤其是跨性别的友谊继续显示出持续的紧张关系。试图实现性亲密但避开夫妻承诺的“色情友谊”继续面临规范和实践上的挑战。在这篇论文中,我通过亲密友谊的小世界查看了异性恋亲密关系的主要方面,这反映了整个世界的性别紧张状况。

著录项

  • 作者

    Blatterer Harry;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号