首页> 外文OA文献 >Lockouts in the Netherlands : why statistics on labour disputes must discriminate between strikes and lockouts, and why new statistics need to be compiled
【2h】

Lockouts in the Netherlands : why statistics on labour disputes must discriminate between strikes and lockouts, and why new statistics need to be compiled

机译:荷兰的停工:为什么劳资纠纷的统计数据必须区分罢工和停工,以及为什么需要汇编新的统计数据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

'Lockouts are a phenomenon greatly underestimated in research into labour relations. Despite the ILO recommendations many national statistical bureaus do not make a distinction between strikes and lockouts. This practice leads to false conclusions about workers' behaviour. After all, strikes and lockouts are two sides of the medal of labour relations but really two different sides. Strikes are a weapon of workers, whereas lockouts can be a means by which employers force their workers into a certain direction. The data on labour relations should therefore discriminate between strikes and lockouts. Because the official data often neglect this, it may be necessary to do own research into the subject. This article shows the argument for discrimination taking the Netherlands as an example with some references to other countries.' (author's abstract)
机译:停工是在劳资关系研究中大大低估的现象。尽管有国际劳工组织的建议,许多国家统计局并未在罢工和停工之间做出区分。这种做法导致对工人行为的错误结论。毕竟,罢工和停工是劳动关系勋章的两个方面,但实际上是两个不同的方面。罢工是工人的武器,而停工是雇主强迫工人朝某个方向前进的一种手段。因此,有关劳资关系的数据应区分罢工和停工。由于官方数据经常忽略这一点,因此可能有必要对该主题进行自己的研究。本文以荷兰为例,并参考了其他国家,展示了歧视的论点。” (作者的摘要)

著录项

  • 作者

    Velden Sjaak van der;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号