首页> 外文OA文献 >How much inequality of earnings do people perceive as just? The effect of interviewer presence and monetary incentives on inequality preferences
【2h】

How much inequality of earnings do people perceive as just? The effect of interviewer presence and monetary incentives on inequality preferences

机译:人们认为正义带来了多少收入不平等?面试官的存在和金钱激励对不平等偏好的影响

摘要

"This paper describes two studies designed to test how two structural conditions of an interview situation - the presence of an interviewer and use of incentives - influence respondents' preferences regarding inequality. According to goal-framing theory and findings from empirical justice research, different goal frames are activated in different types of relationships, producing different distributional preferences: Cooperative situations induce a normative goal frame resulting in a stronger preference for equality whereas competitive situations induce a gain frame in which individuals have stronger preferences for inequality. Assuming the former type of relationship is established by the presence of an interviewer and the latter type by incentivizing, we conducted two studies to test our hypotheses.The results suggest that building a cooperative relationship through interviewer presence and cooperation priming leads to a preference for equality, while use of incentives leads to a clear preference for inequality." (author's abstract)
机译:“本文描述了两项旨在测试面试情况的两个结构性条件(面试官的存在和激励措施的使用)如何影响受访者关于不平等的偏好的两项研究。根据目标框架理论和经验正义研究的发现,不同的目标框架在不同类型的关系中被激活,从而产生不同的分布偏好:合作环境诱导了规范的目标框架,从而导致了对平等的更强偏好,而竞争环境则引起了收益框架,其中个体对不平等的偏好更强。它是由面试官在场而建立的,后者是通过激励来建立的,我们进行了两项研究以检验我们的假设。结果表明,通过面试官在场和合作启动来建立合作关系会导致人们偏向于平等,而使用激励会导致平等给一个偏爱不平等。” (作者的摘要)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号