首页> 外文OA文献 >Ziprasidone vs clozapine in schizophrenia patients refractory to multiple antipsychotic treatments: the MOZART study
【2h】

Ziprasidone vs clozapine in schizophrenia patients refractory to multiple antipsychotic treatments: the MOZART study

机译:齐普拉西酮vs氯氮平在多种抗精神病药物治疗无效的精神分裂症患者中的疗效:MOZART研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This 18-week, randomized, flexible-dose, double-blind, double-dummy trial evaluated ziprasidone as an alternative to clozapine in treatment-refractory schizophrenia patients. Patients had a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia, a history of resistance and/or intolerance to at least three acute cycles with different antipsychotics given at therapeutic doses, PANSS score >or= 80, and CGI-S score >or= 4. Patients were randomized to ziprasidone (80-160 mg/day, n = 73) or clozapine (250-600 mg/day, n = 74). On the primary ITT-LOCF analysis, baseline-to-endpoint decreases in PANSS total scores were similar in the ziprasidone (- 25.0 +/- 22.0, 95% CI - 30.2 to - 19.8) and clozapine (- 24.5 +/- 22.5, 95% CI - 29.7 to - 19.2) groups. A progressive and significant reduction from baseline in PANSS total score was observed from day 11 in both study arms. There were also significant improvements on PANSS subscales, CGI-S, CG-I, CDSS, and GAF, without between-drug differences. The two treatment groups had similar rates of early discontinuations due to AEs. AEs were mostly of similar mild-moderate severity in the two groups. There were also no detrimental effects on prolactin, renal and liver function, hematology, and cardiovascular parameters. However, ziprasidone but not clozapine showed a significant reduction of SAS and AIMS scores. Moreover, when compared with clozapine, ziprasidone also had a more favorable metabolic profile, with significant endpoint differences in weight, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. In conclusion, this trial indicates that both ziprasidone and clozapine, having comparable efficacy coupled with satisfactory general safety and tolerability, may be regarded as valuable options for the short-term treatment of difficult-to-treat schizophrenia patients with a history of multiple resistance and/or intolerance to antipsychotics. The more favorable metabolic profile of ziprasidone may represent an added value that could guide clinicians, at least in the presence of patients at high risk for metabolic disorders.
机译:这项为期18周的随机,灵活剂量,双盲,双模拟试验评估了难治性精神分裂症患者使用齐拉西酮替代氯氮平的情况。患者具有精神分裂症的DSM-IV诊断,对至少三个急性周期有抗药性和/或不耐受的病史,并以治疗剂量,PANSS评分≥80或CGI-S评分≥4给予了不同的抗精神病药。随机分为齐拉西酮(80-160 mg / day,n = 73)或氯氮平(250-600 mg / day,n = 74)。在主要的ITT-LOCF分析中,齐拉西酮(-25.0 +/- 22.0,95%CI-30.2到-19.8)和氯氮平(-24.5 +/- 22.5, 95%CI-29.7至-19.2)组。从第11天开始,在两个研究组中均观察到PANSS总评分相对于基线的显着降低。 PANSS子量表,CGI-S,CG-1,CDSS和GAF也有显着改善,而无药物差异。两个治疗组因不良事件而导致的早期停药率相似。两组中的AE大多具有相似的轻度-中度严重性。对催乳素,肾和肝功能,血液学和心血管参数也没有有害影响。但是,齐拉西酮而非氯氮平显示出SAS和AIMS评分显着降低。此外,与氯氮平相比,齐拉西酮还具有更有利的代谢特性,在体重,空腹血糖,总胆固醇,LDL胆固醇和甘油三酸酯方面存在显着的终点差异。总之,该试验表明,具有可比的功效,令人满意的总体安全性和耐受性的齐拉西酮和氯氮平,都可以被视为短期治疗具有多重耐药和多病史的难治性精神分裂症患者的有价值的选择。 /或对抗精神病药不耐受。齐拉西酮的更有利的代谢特征可能代表可以指导临床医生的附加值,至少在存在代谢紊乱风险高的患者的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号