首页> 外文OA文献 >Precisione nella determinazione della lunghezza di lavoro mediante localizzatori elettronici d’apice, radiologia digitale e prova visiva: presentazione di una nuova metodica sperimentale di indagine – uno studio ex-vivo. Exact determination of the working length by electronic apex locators, digital radiology, and visual test: presentation of a new experimental research strategy – an ex-vivo study.
【2h】

Precisione nella determinazione della lunghezza di lavoro mediante localizzatori elettronici d’apice, radiologia digitale e prova visiva: presentazione di una nuova metodica sperimentale di indagine – uno studio ex-vivo. Exact determination of the working length by electronic apex locators, digital radiology, and visual test: presentation of a new experimental research strategy – an ex-vivo study.

机译:通过电子顶点定位器,数字放射学和视觉测试确定工作长度的准确性:介绍了一种新的实验研究方法-一项体外研究。通过电子顶点定位器,数字放射学和视觉测试精确确定工作长度:提出了新的实验研究策略-一项体外研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AbstractudObjectives: This study compared: 1) the accuracy of three different electronic apex locatorsud(EALs) in detecting the apical foramen ex-vivo under clinical conditions; 2) the accuracy of digitaludradiography and EALs in determining the K-file position in the root canal; 3) the accuracy of twouddifferent radiographic planes; (4) the precision of #10, #15, and #20 K-files in electronicudmeasurements; 5) the precision of EALs in relation to the dental anatomy classification (anterior,udbicuspids, and molars).udMaterials and methods: The length of 101 extracted human teeth was measured with threeuddifferent EALs (Endex, Propex II and Root ZX), with RVG and compared to the actual length.udExperimental procedures were performed using an endodontic training kit (Pro-Train).udResults: The statistical analysis showed that Endex and Propex II were more accurate than RootudZX in determining the working length (WL). The t-test showed no statistically significantuddifference of accuracy between the two radiographic planes examined. The t-test showed noudsignificant difference between the three different K-file size measurements. EALs and RVG areudless accurate in anterior teeth.udConclusions: To prevent overestimation of the root canal length using the EALs tested, 1 mmudshould be subtracted from the measurement on the ‘‘APEX’’ mark. Instrument sizes did not affectudthe accuracy of EALs. EALs showed to be more accurate in determining the WL than RVG.ud 2011 Societa` Italiana di Endodonzia. Published by Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved.
机译:摘要目的:本研究比较了:1)在临床条件下,三种不同的电子根尖定位器(uds)/ ud(EAL)在离体检测心尖孔的准确性; 2)数字放射线照相术和EAL在确定根管中K锉位置时的准确性; 3)两个不同的射线照相平面的精度; (4)电子测量中#10,#15和#20 K文件的精度; 5)EALs与牙齿解剖分类(前牙, udbicuspids和磨牙)相关的精度。 ud材料和方法:使用三种不同的EALs(Endex,Propex II和Root ZX)测量101颗拔出的人类牙齿的长度),使用RVG并与实际长度进行比较。 ud使用牙髓训练套件(Pro-Train)进行实验程序。 ud结果:统计分析表明,Endex和Propex II在确定工作量方面比Root udZX更准确长度(WL)。 t检验表明,所检查的两个射线照相平面之间的准确性没有统计学上的显着差异。 t检验显示三种不同的K档案大小测量结果之间没有显着差异。 Euds和RVG在前牙上非常精确。 ud结论:为防止使用测试的EALs高估根管长度,应在“ APEX”标记上减去1 mm ud。仪器尺寸不会影响EAL的准确性。事实证明,EAL比RVG更准确地确定WL。 ud 2011 Societa` Italiana di Endodonzia。由Elsevier Srl发布。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号