首页> 外文OA文献 >The development of a generic outsourcing decision model with validation through automotive industry case studies.
【2h】

The development of a generic outsourcing decision model with validation through automotive industry case studies.

机译:通过汽车行业案例研究验证通用外包决策模型的开发。

摘要

Aims and Objectives of Research. 1. To develop a ¿one stop¿ generic decision making matrix (Outsourcing Decision Model) that provides the necessary clarity into defining whether an organisation should proceed with an outsourcing initiative or not. This would be based upon a distillation of existing models and reviewed literature. With the recognition that there may be subsequent advantages following the process, the model will include not only these but a means of evaluation in order to ascertain whether or not an outsourcing initiative may be or was successful or not. This latter aspect must logically be viewed as veryudimportant as an outsourcer must be aware of the benefits and also whether or not they were achieved. In addition, the model would include sufficient guidance with potential supporting metrics and their application.ud2. To validate the Outsourcing Model through specific case studies using a triangulated approach in comparing the selected automotive OEM with some of its major competitors. Within the context of the case study, the research would also attempt to understand how the subject outsourcing organisation compares to its major competitors in equivalent comparable products and whether or not this reflects in the success of these companies. This case study not only provides a means of reinforcing the remaining case studies by using a triangulated method of application to the research developed outsourcing decision model but also provides a deeper understanding of the context of the supplier and competitors within the industry.ud3. To test, via case studies the effect of specificity relating to the outsourced end product rather than the outsourced entity. This aspect provides the deepest application to the researched outsourcing decision model and therefore the most comprehensive validation. In addition, because the case studies are retrospective, they have the benefit of providing data to establish the level of success. This would be very important, particularly as it would enable a focus on particular criteria that failed to highlight a particular outcome and therefore provide a chance to make amendments. Low specificity is a well established criterion in defining an outsourced entityudwhich is reflected within the body of the research. The further extension of this theory towards the outsourcing of and outsourced entity related to an established previously outsourced commodity is a new concept with no identifiable literature or evidence relating to its importance. The fact that it provides an element within the research that is potentially unique and carries no extra task burden it has been captured as an added element within the two important validation case studies:ud4. To evaluate if outsourcing performance can be enhanced through the introduction of a second supplier into a single supplier sourcing situation. Subsequent to outsourcing, this aim and objective focuses upon the possibility of enhancing performance through the introduction of a second supplier. Particularly in cases whereby expertise may have been lost from an outsourcer, ultimate results relating to the outsourced entity may be compromised through either opportunism or diminished supplier performance. Whether these aspects are deliberate or unintended, an outsourcer should have some means of mitigating this risk. This mitigation may potentially be enabled through the use of a second supplier in order to provide a degree of competition.ud5. To identify a link between Specificity, Commonality and Platform Sharing. The Author's professional role was very heavily based around the modern practices within the Automotive Industry. Outsourcing, platform sharing and commonality are well publicised strategies that have been adopted by various car manufacturers in order to gain efficiencies. Researchudwas carried out in order to provide a better understanding of these strategies and to establish if there is any link between them. A confirmation of any linkages may then provide potential for establishing greater synergies between them.
机译:研究目的和目标。 1.开发“一站式”通用决策矩阵(外包决策模型),该矩阵为定义组织是否应进行外包计划提供了必要的清晰度。这将基于现有模型的提炼和文献综述。认识到在此过程中可能会有后续优势,该模型将不仅包括这些优势,而且还包括一种评估手段,以确定外包计划是否成功。从逻辑上讲,后一个方面必须被视为非常“重要”,因为外包商必须意识到收益以及是否实现了收益。此外,该模型将包括足够的指导以及潜在的支持指标及其应用。 ud2。通过使用三角方法比较选定的汽车OEM与其一些主要竞争对手的特定案例研究来验证外包模型。在案例研究的背景下,该研究还将尝试了解主题外包组织如何与同等可比产品中的主要竞争对手进行比较,以及这是否反映了这些公司的成功。此案例研究不仅提供了一种方法,可以通过将三角剖分的方法应用于研究开发的外包决策模型来加强其余的案例研究,而且还可以使您更深入地了解行业中供应商和竞争对手的情况。 ud3。通过案例研究来检验与外包最终产品而不是外包实体有关的特异性影响。这方面为研究的外包决策模型提供了最深入的应用,因此也提供了最全面的验证。此外,由于案例研究是回顾性的,因此它们具有提供数据以建立成功水平的好处。这将是非常重要的,尤其是因为它将使重点放在未能突出特定结果的特定标准上,从而提供了进行修改的机会。低特异性是定义外包实体 ud的良好标准,而外包实体 ud反映在研究主体之内。将该理论进一步扩展到与已建立的先前外包商品有关的外包和外包实体是一个新概念,没有可识别的文献或证据表明其重要性。它在研究中提供了可能是唯一的元素,并且没有额外的任务负担,这一事实已在两个重要的验证案例研究中被视为附加元素: ud4。评估是否可以通过将第二个供应商引入单个供应商采购情况来增强外包绩效。外包之后,此目的和目标集中于通过引入第二个供应商来提高绩效的可能性。特别是在可能已失去外包商专业知识的情况下,与外包实体有关的最终结果可能会因机会主义或供应商绩效下降而受到损害。无论这些方面是有意还是无意,外包商都应有一些缓解这种风险的方法。可以通过使用第二个供应商来实现这种缓解,以提供一定程度的竞争。确定特异性,通用性和平台共享之间的联系。作者的职业角色主要是基于汽车行业的现代实践。外包,平台共享和通用性是广为人知的策略,已被多家汽车制造商采用,以提高效率。为了更好地理解这些策略并确定它们之间是否存在任何联系,进行了研究。然后,对任何链接的确认可以提供在它们之间建立更大协同作用的潜力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bowles David;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号