首页> 外文OA文献 >A critical analysis of theories of agricultural development and agrarian reform, with reference to agrarian reform policies in Chile (1962-1973).
【2h】

A critical analysis of theories of agricultural development and agrarian reform, with reference to agrarian reform policies in Chile (1962-1973).

机译:对农业发展和土地改革理论的批判性分析,并参考了智利的土地改革政策(1962-1973年)。

摘要

This thesis is a work of theory; it is also historical. Itudattempts to provide a critique of the categories through whichudthe phenomena of agricultural development and land reform areudhabitually grasped. It is divided into three parts.udIn the first part three main theoretical orientations to theudstudy of capitalist agrarian development are discussed, bothudabstractly and with reference to their accounts of LatinudAmerican rural society in the 1960's. It is argued that alludthree are unable to explain adequately the process of socialudand agrarian change. This inability is traced to the factudthat all three reduce social totalities to two or more distinctudsub-entities or sub-totalities. The author calls this generaludposition the social problematic of dualism. Its inability. toudaccount for social change is, he argues, traceable to the factudthat the existence of the sub-entities into which socialudtotalities are divided, is posited as theoretically prior toudthe relations which connect them. These points are pursuedudin the second and third parts of the thesis.udIn the second part an alternative to dualism' with pärticularudreference to its variants of the separation of a realm of'udindustry from a realm of*agriculture, and of the separationudof a realm of the economic from a realm of the social, isudprovided through a detailed theorisation of capitalist socialudrelations. It is argued that the existence of distinct realmsudof agriculture, industry, economy and society is a real effectudof the essential relations of capitalist society, and thatudthese divisions must be transcended through an elucidation ofudthe character of such relations. This is done by distinguishingi;udthree forms of capitalist development which are produced byudthese essential relations. Further examples of a dualistudanalysis in contemporary theorisations of petty commodityudproduction, the world economy and the articulation of modesudof production are discussed.udIn the third part the author returns to an examination of theudLatin American context through a discussion of the case ofudChile. The theoretical insights developed in the earlierudparts are systematically applied to various aspects of Chileanudhistory from the conquest of Latin America to the 1960's, andudto the processes of land reform which covered the decadeud1962-1973. It is suggested that the agrarian social transformationsudwhich this country experienced are only explicable inudterms of a position which systematically transcends all dualistudassumptions.
机译:本论文是理论著作。这也是历史。试图对习惯于理解农业发展和土地改革现象的类别进行批判。它分为三个部分。第一部分讨论了资本主义农业发展研究的三个主要理论方向,既有抽象性,也有参考了他们在1960年代对拉丁美洲/南美农村社会的描述。有人认为,所有三个人都无法充分解释社会土地和土地变化的过程。这种无能可归因于以下事实:所有三个人都将社会总体减少为两个或更多不同的 udsub-entity或sub-totalities。作者称这种普遍性为二元论的社会问题。其无能。他认为,对社会变革的解释可以追溯到一个事实,即社会 uttalities被划分为一个子实体的存在,是在理论上先于 w其连接的关系。这些观点在本文的第二和第三部分中都有论述。 ud在第二部分中,二元论的另一种选择是特殊的 u u003c u003c u200b u003c u003c u200b u003c经济领域与社会领域的分离 ud,是通过对资本主义社会问题的详细理论化而提供的。有人认为,农业,工业,经济和社会各个领域的存在是对资本主义社会基本关系的实际影响,对这些分歧必须通过阐明这种关系的性质加以超越。这是通过区分由这些本质关系产生的三种形式的资本主义发展来完成的。讨论了当代小商品 ud生产,世界经济和生产方式 udof生产的理论化中的二元论 udanalysis的更多实例。 ud第三部分,作者通过讨论回到对 ud拉丁美洲背景的考察。 udChile的情况。较早的部分发展出的理论见解被系统地应用于智利历史学的各个方面,从征服拉丁美洲到1960年代,以及涵盖1962 1973十年的土地改革过程。有人认为,这个国家经历的农业社会变革只能在一个系统地超越所有二元论证的立场上来解释。

著录项

  • 作者

    Neocosmos Michael;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1982
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号