首页> 外文OA文献 >On being holier-than-thou: a critique of Curry Malott's 'Pseudo-Marxism and the reformist retreat from revolution'
【2h】

On being holier-than-thou: a critique of Curry Malott's 'Pseudo-Marxism and the reformist retreat from revolution'

机译:关于比谁神圣:对库里·马洛特(Curry Malott)的“伪马克思主义和改良主义者退出革命”的批评

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the May 2011 edition of this journal, Curry Malott contributed an essay review of Jean Anyon‘s Marx and Education (2011). I would summarize Mallot‘s critiques of her book as follows: (1) she didn‘t write the book that he wanted her to write, (2) she didn‘t cite the authors that he wanted her to cite, and (3) her work is anti-Marxist because her take on the literature isn‘t identical to his. While his intention was to expose her book as undermining Marxist analysis even as she sought to support it, Malott‘s essay is actually more successful as an example of the dangers of sectarianism and of the tendency on the Left to purge those viewed as not sufficiently conforming to orthodoxy in their positions. By examining the problems in his essay I hope to provide a cautionary tale that may encourage Malott, and others, to remember the praxis in revolution.
机译:在该杂志的2011年5月版中,库里·马洛特(Curry Malott)发表了让·安永(Jean Anyon)的《马克思与教育》(Marx and Education)(2011)的论文评论。我可以总结一下Mallot对她的书的评论:(1)她没有写他想让她写的书,(2)她没有引述他要她引用的书,以及(3 )她的作品是反马克思主义的,因为她对文学的理解与他的观点不同。尽管马洛特的意图是即使试图寻求支持,也要揭露她的书破坏了马克思主义的分析,但马洛特的论文实际上更为成功,以此作为宗派主义危险和左派倾向于清除那些认为不够充分的倾向的例子。在其位置上与正统一致。通过研究他的论文中的问题,我希望提供一个警告性的故事,以鼓励马洛特和其他人记住革命的实践。

著录项

  • 作者

    McGrew Ken;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号