首页> 外文OA文献 >Malaysian pharmacy educators’ view of the role of non-pharmacy trained educators in teaching pharmacy students
【2h】

Malaysian pharmacy educators’ view of the role of non-pharmacy trained educators in teaching pharmacy students

机译:马来西亚药房教育者对未经药房培训的教育者在药房学生教学中的作用的看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The common statement “…Pharmacy students should only be taught by pharmacists…” is a norm among many pharmacy educators in countries such as Malaysia. It is not, per se, a confronting statement but could indicate alarming attitudes not favorable to the current pharmacy education framework.ududPharmacy education in the third millennium is transformed to contain and reflect on the innovations of the modernization era in which, globalization in health education, public health, development of the new facets of professionalization and professionalism, interprofessional and interdisciplinary teaching and learning activities are among the most talked about topics.1-6ududInterestingly, these innovative ideas are the result of extremely cautious, vigilant, accurate, and continuous observations and contemplations which have undergone thorough examinations and experimentations before being presented as novice ideas and/or theories. For example, the notion of interdisciplinary learning dates back to late 1970s7 and today, there is concrete evidence of its effectiveness and usefulness in delivery of better health care.6,8 Hence, to contest such ideas and/or theories, one needs to be able to provide reliable evidence(s), as agreements or disagreements should be borne with a full sense of responsibility and accountability.
机译:在马来西亚等国家,许多药房教育工作者普遍认为“……药房的学生只能由药剂师来教……”。从本质上讲,这不是一个相互对立的说法,但可能表明令人不安的态度不利于当前的药学教育框架。 ud ud第三个千年的药学教育已经转型,以遏制和反思现代化全球化时代的创新在健康教育中,公共卫生,专业化和专业化的新面貌的发展,跨专业和跨学科的教与学活动是最受关注的话题。1-6 ud ud有趣的是,这些创新思想是极其谨慎的结果,警惕,准确和连续的观察和沉思,它们在被作为新手思想和/或理论提出之前已经进行了彻底的检查和实验。例如,跨学科学习的概念可以追溯到1970年代后期7,而今天,有具体的证据表明其在提供更好的医疗保健方面的有效性和实用性。6,8因此,要想对这些思想和/或理论进行反驳,就必须能够提供可靠的证据,因为协议或分歧应以充分的责任感和责任感承担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号