首页> 外文OA文献 >His bark is worse than his bite: perceptions and rationalization of canine aggressive behavior
【2h】

His bark is worse than his bite: perceptions and rationalization of canine aggressive behavior

机译:他的树皮比他的叮咬还糟:对狗的攻击行为的认识和合理化

摘要

Qualitative methods are increasingly used to investigate the complexities of the dog-humanudrelationship. In order to inform a larger study of human dog interaction, a focus group studyudwas carried out to address the question ‘How is aggressive behavior in dogs perceived andudrationalized by people who have experience of dog behavior?’ Six focus groups, including threeud‘non-professional’ groups (two groups of dog owners and one group of amateur trainers) andudthree ‘professional’ groups (a behaviorist group, veterinary group and academic group) wereudcarried out, involving participants who were recruited opportunistically. The focus groupudtranscripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings indicated that participants who doudnot work with dogs in a professional capacity are largely defensive of dogs when discussingudaggressive behavior. However, these participants also discussed factors that make a dog ‘risky’udand how responsible owners manage that risk and the characteristics of ‘dangerous dogs’. Forudthe professional groups, aggressive behavior in dogs presents a barrier to everyday work. Theyudconsidered working with the owners of dogs showing aggressive behavior and battlingudanthropogenic stereotypes and misconceptions to be part of the professional challenge.udProfessionals also contributed views on the nature of ‘dangerous dogs’ and demonstratedudawareness of how perceptions could be distorted by the media and propagation of stereotypes.udThis research highlights the variability of perceptions about canine aggressive behavior.udFindings can inform the critical interpretation of quantitative results, and offer a foundation forudquantitative study of human directed aggressive behavior in dogs.
机译:定性方法越来越多地用于研究狗与人之间的关系。为了向更广泛的人类狗互动研究提供信息,进行了焦点小组研究,以解决以下问题:“具有狗行为经验的人如何感知和理性化狗的攻击行为?”六个焦点小组,其中包括开展了三个“非专业”小组(两组狗主人和一组业余培训师)和“三个”“专业”小组(行为主义者小组,兽医小组和学术小组),招募了参加者机会主义的。使用主题分析法分析焦点小组文字记录。研究结果表明,在讨论 uda行行为时,不以专业身份与狗一起工作的参与者在很大程度上防御了狗。但是,这些参与者还讨论了使狗“变胖”的因素,以及负责任的所有者如何管理这种风险以及“危险狗”的特征。对于专业人士而言,狗的攻击行为是日常工作的障碍。他们考虑与表现出攻击性行为的狗的主人一起工作,并与人类产生的定型观念和误解作斗争,这是职业挑战的一部分。 ud专业人士还对“危险狗”的性质发表了看法,并证明了对意识如何被扭曲的认识。 ud这项研究突出了人们对犬攻击行为的看法的变异性。 ud研究结果可以为定量结果的批判性解释提供依据,并为狗对人的攻击行为的定量研究提供基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号