首页> 外文OA文献 >Working through the working class: the case of Jonathan Lethem’s Dissident Gardens
【2h】

Working through the working class: the case of Jonathan Lethem’s Dissident Gardens

机译:在工人阶级中工作:以乔纳森·莱瑟姆(Jonathan Lethem)的《异见花园》为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Marxist literary theorisation has long proposed that the gaps, absences and contradictions evident within the literary text constitute a productive site for critical exploration. Turning a harsh gaze upon Jonathan Lethem’s Dissident Gardens (2013), a multigenerational narrative dealing with the legacy of American communism, civil rights activism and class consciousness, this paper proposes that the seeming avoidance (even abandonment) of the working class within a text focused on excavating the history of US communism, offers a number of interesting parallels with contemporary post-Marxism.ududUsing Wendy Brown’s famous essay ‘Resisting Left Melancholia’ (1999), and the work of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, particularly their Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (1985), the paper aims to contribute to developing new critical approaches to class by seeking to complicate the notion that post-Marxism has abandoned class categories for the seemingly more productive paradigms of gender, sexuality, ethnicity, post-structuralism and postmodernism. While Dissident Gardens seems to suggest, like Brown’s essay, that the radical left is crippled by a nostalgia for the failures of European Marxism, (‘socialism's failure as an intimate wound’), the text seeks to address marginalisation, discrimination and abandonment in all its forms. The paper closes by tentatively arguing that the novel can be positioned within an emerging cannon of post-Marxist fiction.
机译:马克思主义的文学理论长期以来一直认为,文学文本中明显的空白,缺憾和矛盾构成了批判性探索的生产基地。乔纳森·莱瑟姆(Jonathan Lethem)的《异议花园》(Dissident Gardens)(2013)是一部涉及美国共产主义,民权活动主义和阶级意识遗产的多代叙事小说,这引起了严厉的目光,本文提出,在文本中,工人阶级的看似回避(甚至是放弃)关于挖掘美国共产主义的历史,与当代后马克思主义有许多有趣的相似之处。 ud ud使用温迪·布朗的著名论文《抵抗左手的忧郁症》(Resisting Left Melancholia)(1999)以及埃内斯托·拉克劳和尚塔尔·穆菲的著作,特别是他们的霸权主义和《社会主义战略:迈向激进的民主政治》(1985年),该论文旨在通过寻求使后马克思主义放弃了阶级类别的观念更复杂化的观点,以使阶级,性别,性,种族,后结构主义和后现代主义。尽管异议者花园似乎像布朗的文章那样暗示,左派激进主义因对欧洲马克思主义失败(“社会主义的失败是亲密的伤口”)的怀旧而受到破坏,但该文本试图解决所有国家的边缘化,歧视和抛弃。它的形式。文章最后通过暂时论证该小说可以放在后马克思主义小说的新兴大炮中来结束。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rowcroft Andrew;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号