首页> 外文OA文献 >A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Applied Relaxation for Adults With Generalized Anxiety Disorder
【2h】

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Applied Relaxation for Adults With Generalized Anxiety Disorder

机译:成人广泛性焦虑症认知行为治疗和应用放松的随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This randomized clinical trial compared cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), applied relaxation (AR) and wait-list control (WL) in a sample of 65 adults with a primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). The CBT condition was based on the intolerance of uncertainty model of GAD, whereas the AR condition was based on general theories of anxiety. Both manualized treatments were administered over 12 weekly one-hour sessions. Standardized clinician ratings and self-report questionnaires were used to assess GAD and related symptoms at pretest, posttest, and at 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-ups. At posttest, CBT was clearly superior to WL, AR was marginally superior to WL, and CBT was marginally superior to AR. Over follow-up, CBT and AR were equivalent, but only CBT led to continued improvement. Thus, direct comparisons of CBT and AR indicated that the treatments were comparable; however, comparisons of each treatment with another point of reference (either waiting list or no change over follow-up) provided greater support for the efficacy of CBT than AR.
机译:这项随机临床试验比较了65名成年人的认知行为疗法(CBT),应用放松(AR)和等待清单对照(WL),并初步诊断为广泛性焦虑症(GAD)。 CBT条件是基于GAD不确定性模型的不容忍度,而AR条件是基于一般性焦虑理论。两种手动治疗均在每周1小时的12个疗程中进行。在测试前,测试后以及6、12和24个月的随访中,使用标准化的临床医生评分和自我报告调查表评估GAD和相关症状。在后测中,CBT明显优于WL,AR略胜于WL,CBT略胜于AR。在后续行动中,CBT和AR相当,但只有CBT才能带来持续的进步。因此,直接比较CBT和AR表示治疗是可比的。然而,将每种疗法与另一个参考点(等待名单或随访中未发生变化)进行比较,对AR的疗效提供了比AR更好的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号