首页> 外文OA文献 >'Pay any price, bear any burden': The U.S. Army's Counter-Insurgency Doctrine from Kennedy to the Vietnam War
【2h】

'Pay any price, bear any burden': The U.S. Army's Counter-Insurgency Doctrine from Kennedy to the Vietnam War

机译:``付出任何代价,承担任何负担'':从肯尼迪到越战的美国陆军反叛原则

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis is an analysis of the U.S. Army’s counter-insurgency doctrine from its roots to its application in South Vietnam during the Vietnam War. Contrary to the arguments of a specific section of scholars, the Army did not fail to defeat the National Liberation Front (NLF) because it did not use counter-insurgency methods. This thesis explains that the Army developed a comprehensive, albeit flawed, counter-insurgency doctrine and applied it in South Vietnam. While the Army’s counter-insurgency doctrine had serious deficiencies, it was the deeply unsound South Vietnamese government and the NLF’s formidable political revolution that were the primary reasons for its failure to achieve its objectives.ududThis thesis utilises the body of literature produced by U.S. Army officers, officers of allied nations and academics during the creation of the Army’s counter-insurgency doctrine, as well as the field manuals that resulted from this research. These sources reveal the self-interest of Army commanders in their pursuit of a counter-insurgency mission, the purpose of which was to reverse the reductions enforced upon the Army during the 1950s. Crucially, these sources also display the Army’s perception of insurgencies in the developing world as the result of Communist-bloc attempts to expand communism. This perception, as well as the overconfidence of much of the Army’s leadership, was influential in shaping counter-insurgency doctrine.ududThe Army’s self-interest put it on a path of its own making that led to the Vietnam War. The Army’s field manuals on counter-insurgency warfare show it expected to face an insurgency that was born out of the Cold War struggle and its methods reflected this belief. Therefore, it did not grasp that the NLF’s revolution had deep-seated historical roots. The Army’s counter-insurgency programmes, which emphasised civic action and destruction of guerrillas, were wholly ineffective in eradicating the NLF’s largely political revolution.
机译:本文从对美军的反叛乱学说的起源到在越南战争期间在南越的应用进行分析。与某些学者的观点相反,陆军没有击败国民解放阵线(NLF),因为它没有使用反叛乱方法。这篇论文解释说,陆军发展了一种全面的,尽管有缺陷的,平叛主义的理论,并将其应用到越南南部。尽管陆军的反叛乱理论存在严重缺陷,但南越政府的不健全和NLF的强大政治革命才是其未能实现其目标的主要原因。 ud ud美国陆军军官,盟国军官和学者在陆军平叛理论的创建过程中以及根据这项研究得出的野战手册。这些资料表明,陆军指挥官追求反叛乱任务是出于自身利益,其目的是扭转1950年代对陆军实施的裁减。至关重要的是,这些消息还表明,由于共产主义集团扩大共产主义的努力,陆军对发展中国家的叛乱有所了解。这种看法以及陆军大部分领导层的过分自信,在形成反叛主义理论方面都具有影响力。 ud ud陆军的私利促使其走上了自己的道路,从而引发了越南战争。陆军反叛乱战的野战手册表明,它预期将面临一场源于冷战斗争的叛乱,其方法反映了这种信念。因此,它不了解NLF的革命具有深厚的历史根源。陆军的反叛乱计划强调了公民行动和销毁游击队,但在消灭NLF很大程度上是政治革命方面完全无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号