首页> 外文OA文献 >Being a Critical Professional: The Importance of Post‐Publication Peer Review in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

【2h】

Being a Critical Professional: The Importance of Post‐Publication Peer Review in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

机译：成为关键专家：出版后同行评审在循证图书馆和信息实践中的重要性

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

n/a

机译：不适用

著录项

作者
Kloda Lorie A.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2009
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Being a Critical Professional: The Importance of Post-Publication Peer Review in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice [J] . Lorie A. Kloda Evidence Based Library and Information Practice . 2009,第3期

机译：成为关键专家：出版后同行评审在循证图书馆和信息实践中的重要性
2. Identifying real-world evidence data sources in peer-reviewed publications: planning the peripheral artery disease in clinical practice (APHELIA) study [J] . Johansson Saga, Hasvold Pal, Westergaard Mogens, Current medical research and opinion . 2017,第Suppla1期

机译：在同行评审出版物中识别现实世界的证据数据来源：规划临床实践中的外周血动脉疾病（Aphelia）研究
3. Identifying real-world evidence data sources in peer-reviewed publications: planning the peripheral artery disease in clinical practice (APHELIA) study [J] . Johansson Saga, Hasvold Pal, Westergaard Mogens, Current medical research and opinion . 2017,第Suppla1期

机译：在同行评审出版物中识别现实世界的证据数据来源：规划临床实践中的外周血动脉疾病（Aphelia）研究
4. Pre-Submission and Post-Publication Reviews as Partial Solutions to the Fundamental Inadequacy of Public Health Science Peer Review [C] . Carl V. PHILLIPS, Paul BERGEN, Karyn HEAVNER World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics . 2009

机译：提交预先发布和发布审查作为公共卫生科学同行评审的基本不足的局部解决方案
5. Faculty mentor insights on dissertation literature reviews: Critical components and professional practices for scholarship. [D] . Gottfried, Paya Nancy. 2016

机译：教师关于论文文献评论的见解：奖学金的重要组成部分和专业实践。
6. High nonpublication rate from publication professionals hinders evidence-based publication practices [O] . Luke C. Carey, Serina Stretton, Charlotte A. Kenreigh, -1

机译：出版专业人士的高未出版率阻碍了循证出版实践
7. Being a Critical Professional: The Importance of Post-Publication Peer Review in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice [O] . Kloda, Lorie A. 2014

机译：成为关键专家：出版后同行评审在循证图书馆和信息实践中的重要性

Being a Critical Professional: The Importance of Post‐Publication Peer Review in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

摘要

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅