首页> 外文OA文献 >La recuperación de la información : ¿Lenguaje natural vs. Lenguaje controlado?
【2h】

La recuperación de la información : ¿Lenguaje natural vs. Lenguaje controlado?

机译:信息检索:自然语言与自然语言受控语言?

摘要

Conference which has as objective to revise the different dilemmas which had to undergo the task of indization (special mention to the web environment) though the 20th century, not only in Argentina but around the world. Each one of them is presented like a conflict, with an explanation about its motives, the environments in which they occurred and the favorable and unfavorable arguments held. It brings out that before the alternative human indization vs. Automatic indization, all the systems of classification, systematics or not, pre or post coordinated, subject heading lists or thesauri, are put in doubt. It is also in doubt a substantial part of our professional work. We as librarians are perfectly equipped for cataloging the web and not because we are better or worse than the search robots, but because the searchers give certain alternatives by using different forms of automatic indization and we can offer another alternatives of recall using assignated indization. It concludes in that librarian will never build a unique system of inidization or classification which works like a true standard, it is to say that it will work the same way in any situation.
机译:该会议旨在修正20世纪以来不仅在阿根廷而且在世界范围内必须经历的工业化任务(特别提到网络环境)的各种难题。他们中的每一个都像冲突一样呈现,并对其冲突的动机,发生冲突的环境以及持有的有利和不利论据进行了解释。结果表明,在替代人性化与自动性化之前,对所有分类系统,是否进行系统化,前后协调,主题词表或叙词表都提出了疑问。这也无疑是我们专业工作的重要部分。作为图书馆员,我们完全有能力对网络进行分类,并不是因为我们比搜索机器人更好或更差,而是因为搜索者通过使用不同形式的自动信息化来提供某些替代方案,并且我们可以使用分配的信息化来提供召回的另一种方案。得出的结论是,图书馆员永远不会建立像真正的标准那样起作用的独特的信息化或分类系统,也就是说,它在任何情况下都将以相同的方式起作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Soto Susana;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2000
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"es","name":"Spanish","id":10}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号