首页> 外文OA文献 >Free/Open source integrated library management systems: comparative analysis of Koha, PHPMyLibrary and OpenBiblio
【2h】

Free/Open source integrated library management systems: comparative analysis of Koha, PHPMyLibrary and OpenBiblio

机译:免费/开源集成库管理系统:Koha,PHPMyLibrary和OpenBiblio的比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Integrated library management systems can cut costs and enhance the efficiency of library services and therefore are absolutely necessary for the management of house keeping operations. But small and medium- size libraries face a difficult situation due to the high cost of commercial library management systems, foreign or Indian, available in the market. Naturally libraries without much financial resources need a cost effective way to automate their services.Free/Open source software was a revolutionary concept among computer programmers and users. To a certain extent free/ open source solutions could provide an alternative solution to costly commercial application software’s. Free/Open source software is, software that users have the ability to run, copy, distribute, study, change, share and improve for any purpose. About eight free/open source library management systems are available and libraries can consider these alternatives.The comparative study aims to evaluate the functional performance of three steadily improving free/open source softwares, Koha, PhpMylibrary and OpenBiblio. The functional performance was assessed by running the three software’s by entering sample data. A scoring scheme was defined to measure the evaluation of individual functional modules. Combined scores of individual modules were used to measure the total performance of three softwares.On the basis of functional analysis of Koha, PhpMylibrary and OpenBiblio, it was observed that, they can provide the essential functional modules ( cataloguing, circulation and OPAC ) required for the working of small and medium size libraries. Koha satisfies all the functional requirements of a library management system. In addition to the functional modules(acquisition, cataloguing, OPAC, circulation, and serial control), Koha can provide some features that are only available with costly ILS; web OPAC, document status inquiry, reservation and holds of documents through OPAC, customization of user and graphical interface, import and export of MARC data etc. PhpMyLibrary and OpenBiblio are not come up to the level of a comprehensive system. Free/Open source library software’s does not need the initial cost of commercial software and enables libraries to have greater control over their working environment. Library professionals should be aware of the advantages of Free/Open source softwares and should involve in their development.
机译:集成的图书馆管理系统可以降低成本并提高图书馆服务的效率,因此对于管理客房操作绝对必要。但是,由于市场上可买到的外国或印度商业图书馆管理系统的高昂成本,中小型图书馆面临着困难的局面。自然地,没有太多财务资源的图书馆需要一种经济有效的方式来自动化其服务。免费/开源软件是计算机程序员和用户中的革命性概念。在一定程度上,免费/开源解决方案可以为昂贵的商业应用软件提供替代解决方案。自由/开源软件是指用户可以出于任何目的运行,复制,分发,学习,更改,共享和改进的软件。大约有八种免费/开源库管理系统可供使用,图书馆可以考虑这些替代方案。比较研究旨在评估三种稳定改进的免费/开源软件Koha,PhpMylibrary和OpenBiblio的功能性能。通过输入示例数据运行这三个软件来评估功能性能。定义了一个评分方案来衡量各个功能模块的评估。使用各个模块的综合评分来衡量这三个软件的总体性能。在对Koha,PhpMylibrary和OpenBiblio进行功能分析的基础上,观察到它们可以提供所需的基本功能模块(编目,发行和OPAC)。中小型图书馆的工作。 Koha满足图书馆管理系统的所有功能要求。除了功能模块(获取,编目,OPAC,循环和串行控制)之外,Koha还可以提供一些仅在昂贵的ILS中可用的功能; Web OPAC,文件状态查询,通过OPAC保留和保存文件,自定义用户和图形界面,导入和导出MARC数据等。PhpMyLibrary和OpenBiblio尚未达到综合系统的水平。免费/开源图书馆软件不需要商业软件的初始成本,并使图书馆可以更好地控制其工作环境。图书馆专业人员应了解免费/开源软件的优势,并应参与其开发。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vimal Kumar V.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号