首页> 外文OA文献 >Racionalidade dialética entre mito e esclarecimento: uma leitura da Dialética do esclarecimento, de T. W. Adorno e M. Horkheimer
【2h】

Racionalidade dialética entre mito e esclarecimento: uma leitura da Dialética do esclarecimento, de T. W. Adorno e M. Horkheimer

机译:神话与启蒙之间的辩证合理性:T。W. Adorno和M. Horkheimer对启蒙的辩证法的解读

摘要

This study investigates the criticism made by Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer to the modern concept of rationality in the Dialectics of Enlightenment, which is essentially focalized in the promises of the Aufklärung. When they broached the origin of Western logos in a succinct and unique form, realized that the genealogy of knowledge, they perceived that the core is in the dramatic and incontrollable need of the human being to have a self-reliance before the forces of nature which imposes fear. Therefore, the concept of enlightenment can not be understood only in light of eighteenth. For the authors, in the myth there was a knowledge, which is intuitive, explanatory and inseparable from the clarifier thought. This aimed to give explanations and justifications about the events of the relationship between human being and nature. Therefore, i every resistance in the attempt to dominate nature, human beings will increase his potential, his strength and power over it. Thus, the starting point of the Dialectics of Enlightenment is a critique of the enlighten society and modern rationality, which has become instrumental. They make us realize the limits of modernity, reason and science, the more subtle and aggressive aspects that were already present in the mutual relationship between myth and enlightenment. Though the topic broached 'rational dialectic between myth and enlightenment' constitutes the course of this dissertation, it is important to review the question which the authors used to do: why mankind is sinking into a new kind of barbarism? Faced with this question they investigate critically and deepen the strategic and instrumental knowledge that became a mechanism of power and repression. With the thesis that the myth is elucidation and elucidation has become mythology, also shows that modern rationality, under the 'lights' of the reason, has its regression germ in everywhere. The research is developed in three stages: the first chapter includes the context and the sources of the main philosophical questions of the opus Dialectic of Elucidation; the second presents Odysseus as the prototype of modern man from the tour I; Finally, the last chapter deals with the dialectic rationality between myth and elucidation.
机译:这项研究调查了西奥多·阿多尔诺(Theodor Adorno)和马克斯·霍克海默(Max Horkheimer)对启蒙辩证法中现代理性概念的批评,这种批评本质上集中于奥夫克拉伦的承诺。当他们以简洁而独特的方式探讨西方徽标的起源时,他们意识到知识的家谱,他们认为核心是人类对自然的迫切需求,即对人类的自我依赖的戏剧性和不可控制的需求。施加恐惧。因此,启蒙的概念不能仅从第十八个角度来理解。对于作者而言,神话中存在一种知识,它是直观,解释性的,与澄清者的思想密不可分。目的是对人与自然之间关系的事件作出解释和辩护。因此,在试图控制自然的每一次抵抗中,人类都会增加其潜力,力量和力量。因此,启蒙辩证法的出发点是对启蒙社会和现代理性的批判,这已成为工具。它们使我们意识到现代性,理性和科学的局限性,神话与启蒙之间的相互关系中已经存在的更加微妙和侵略性的方面。尽管提出“神话与启蒙之间的理性辩证法”这一主题构成了本论文的过程,但重要的是回顾作者曾经做过的一个问题:人类为何陷入一种新型的野蛮主义?面对这个问题,他们进行了认真的调查,加深了成为力量和压制机制的战略和工具知识。关于神话是阐释,而阐释已成为神话的论点,也表明现代理性在理性的“光明”之下,无处不在。这项研究分三个阶段进行:第一章包括对“话语的辩证法”的主要哲学问题的背景和来源。第二部分展示了奥德修斯作为现代人的原型,来自第一次旅行;最后,最后一章论述了神话与阐释之间的辩证合理性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mass Olmaro Paulo;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 Português
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号