首页> 外文OA文献 >Avaliação no ensino de ciências: estudo na implantação da pedagogia de projetos em escola pública de ensino básico da região metropolitana de Porto Alegre
【2h】

Avaliação no ensino de ciências: estudo na implantação da pedagogia de projetos em escola pública de ensino básico da região metropolitana de Porto Alegre

机译:科学教育中的评估:在阿雷格里港大都会地区公立小学实施项目教学法的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This investigation is composed of a qualitative research which is based on multiple case study. The formal structure of this essay is opened by the introduction, that contextualizes and promotes the questioning for the study, on the second chapter the theoretical assumptions are presented with their relations on the role of the institution of school, pedagogy of projects associated with the teaching of science and transdisciplinarity and evaluation in the school context. On the third part the study methodology is described. On the fourth chapter, result analysis is performed showing the evaluations concepts of the participating teachers, the means and how these teachers perceive the pedagogy of projects. On the fifth part, final considerations are shown and we attempt to comprehend how teachers from two public elementary schools whom work with projects evaluate their students. These institutions are located at two cities within the metropolitan area of state capital Porto Alegre, at Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. This case study of the evaluation process is considered relevant due to our understanding of the challenge the public schools have to measure the knowledge in a way to offer an improvement on the learning and change in the social context of their students. We aim at the comprehension of how the Pedagogy of Projects influences the evaluative process. In order to provide that, we elaborated a survey to semi-structurated interviews. Each participating teacher answered that questionnaire and was later interviewed. Observations were also made during the visitation in both schools. The material was submitted to Discursive Textual Analysis, proposed by Moraes e Galiazzi (2007). This analysis indicated that both schools have diverging methodologies, while the teachers from one of the schools evaluate in a traditional standard, teachers from the other institution are in a transition process, where they have abolished the tests from their evaluation instruments. Their prerogative is of a Dialogical School, but not without some trouble, for the results show that, despite having innovative proposals, the concepts of a traditional evaluation are still present.
机译:该调查由定性研究组成,该研究基于多个案例研究。本文的正式结构是通过引言来打开的,它在上下文中促进了对研究的质疑,在第二章中,提出了关于学校机构作用,与教学相关的教学法的理论假设及其关系。学校环境中的科学,跨学科性和评估。第三部分介绍了研究方法。在第四章中,进行了结果分析,显示了参与教师的评估概念,这些教师的方式以及他们对项目教学法的看法。在第五部分,显示了最终的考虑因素,我们试图理解来自参与项目的两所公立小学的老师如何评估他们的学生。这些机构分别位于巴西南里奥格兰德州州府阿雷格里港大都会地区的两个城市。评估过程的案例研究被认为是相关的,因为我们理解公立学校在衡量知识方面所面临的挑战,以便以一种改进学习方式和改变学生社会背景的方式来对其进行评估。我们旨在理解项目教学法如何影响评估过程。为了提供这一点,我们对半结构化访谈进行了详细调查。每位参与培训的老师都回答了该问卷,并随后接受了采访。在访问期间,两所学校也进行了观察。该材料已提交给Moraes e Galiazzi(2007)提出的Discursive Textual Analysis。该分析表明,两所学校的教学方法各不相同,而其中一所学校的教师以传统标准进行评估,而另一所学校的教师则处于过渡过程中,他们在评估过程中取消了测试。他们的特权是商学院,但并非没有麻烦,因为结果表明,尽管提出了创新的建议,但传统评估的概念仍然存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号