首页> 外文OA文献 >Effect of curing time on the bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or plasma arc light
【2h】

Effect of curing time on the bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or plasma arc light

机译:固化时间对用发光二极管或等离子弧光固化的托槽粘结体系的粘结强度的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of two light units, a light-emitting diode (LED) and a plasma arc light (PAC), on the shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets bonded to enamel. Ninety bovine teeth were divided into six groups, according to the light-curing unit and exposure times used. In the LED (Ortholux; 3M-Unitek) group, the specimens were light cured for 5, 10, and 15 seconds. In the PAC (Apollo 95E; DenMed Technologies) group, the specimens were light cured for 3, 6, and 9 seconds. The brackets were bonded with Transbond XT (3M-Unitek), stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours and then submitted to SBS testing in a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was used to evaluate the amount of adhesive remaining on the teeth. According to analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons test, the highest mean SBS was obtained with the LED at 15 seconds (16.68 MPa), which did not significantly differ from the LED 10 (14.76 MPa) or 5 (13.92 MPa) second groups (P > 0.05). The LED 10 and 5 second groups were not significantly different from the PAC 9 second group (12.66 MPa) or from the PAC 6 second group (9.96 MPa). The lowest mean SBS was obtained with the PAC 3 second group (8.29 MPa), which did not differ significantly from the PAC 6 second group. The method of light curing did not influence the ARI, with score 3 predominant. The LED at 5 seconds and the PAC at 3 seconds provided sufficient mean SBS to resist either orthodontic or masticatory forces.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估两个发光单元,即发光二极管(LED)和等离子弧光(PAC),对粘结在牙釉质支架上的剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。根据光固化单位和所用的曝光时间,将九十个牛牙齿分为六组。在LED(Ortholux; 3M-Unitek)组中,将样品光固化5、10和15秒。在PAC(Apollo 95E; DenMed Technologies)组中,将样品光固化3、6和9秒。将支架与Transbond XT(3M-Unitek)粘合,在37°C的蒸馏水中存储24小时,然后在通用测试机中进行SBS测试。粘合剂残留指数(ARI)用于评估牙齿上残留的粘合剂量。根据方差分析和Tukey多重比较测试,在15秒(16.68 MPa)的LED下获得了最高的平均SBS,与第二组的10组(14.76 MPa)或5组(13.92 MPa)的LED没有显着差异( P> 0.05)。 LED 10和5第二组与PAC 9第二组(12.66 MPa)或与PAC 6第二组(9.96 MPa)没有显着差异。 PAC 3第二组(8.29 MPa)获得最低的平均SBS,与PAC 6第二组无显着差异。光固化方法不影响ARI,主要得分为3。 5秒时的LED和3秒时的PAC提供了足够的平均SBS以抵抗正畸或咀嚼力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号