首页> 外文OA文献 >Dobroć uwalniająca z 'gry w wartości'. O dekonstrukcji myślenia aksjologicznego
【2h】

Dobroć uwalniająca z 'gry w wartości'. O dekonstrukcji myślenia aksjologicznego

机译:善良从“发挥价值”中释放出来。论价值论思维的解构

摘要

The aim of this article is to show that metaphysical level is the core and condition of possibility of axiology. The paper focuses on methodological differentiation concerning two levels: metaphysical and axiological one. The first one is connected with Goodness, which is the essence of values and an atmosphere that precedes every evaluation, while the second one means discourse about values. When metaphysical level with its Goodness is forgotten, axiology changes itself into “game of values”, that arbitrarily builds hierarchy and tries to measure everything. This “game of values” discounts the level of Goodness and functions as a closed area – a system of rules, where there are only  pseudo-values (goods), but there is no reference to Goodness. Without taking into consideration the metaphysical (i.e. ethical in Levinasian terminology) level and personal thinking axiology shows itself as a totalitarian construct, which only seems to be interested in Goodness and in fact it is more focused on constructing values. The difference between metaphysics and axiology is described via phenomenological analysis of Enigma of Goodness (the order of metaphysics) and phenomenon of good (the order of axiology).
机译:本文的目的是表明形而上学的水平是价值论可能性的核心和条件。本文着重于方法论的区分,涉及两个层面:形而上学和价值论。第一个与善良有关,善良是价值的本质,是每次评估之前的氛围,而第二个则是关于价值的论述。当忘记了善良的形而上学水平时,价值论将其自身转变为``价值游戏'',从而任意建立了等级制度并试图衡量一切。这种“价值游戏”打折扣了商品的水平,并作为封闭区域(规则系统)运行,其中规则系统只有伪价值(商品),而没有提及商品。如果不考虑形而上学(即列维纳斯语中的伦理学)水平和个人思维价值论,就表明自己是极权主义的建构者,它似乎只对善良感兴趣,实际上它更侧重于建构价值。形而上学与价值论之间的区别是通过对善之谜(形而上学的顺序)和善意现象(价值论的顺序)的现象学分析来描述的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Małecka Magdalena;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 pol
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号